Везде
The development of human potential, creative work, and the "creative class": the theoretical developments of Russia and China
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
The development of human potential, creative work, and the "creative class": the theoretical developments of Russia and China
Annotation
PII
S020736760019063-8-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Gleb Maslov 
Affiliation: Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Tamara Stepanova
Affiliation: Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Issue 3
Pages
74-83
Abstract

The article discusses the developments of the Soviet school, the post-Soviet school of critical Marxism, the theory of NIO.2 and noonomics, as well as the concept of a common destiny for mankind as an adequate theoretical response to current practical challenges.

The author claims that under the existing circumstances (technological shifts, the growth of creative labor, etc.) the changes in the socio-economic systems are needed promoting the priority of the development of human potential. The theory of human capital based on the outdated and shallow notion of Homo Economicus does not properly respond to modern challenges. The considered alternative theories, which have been developed by Russian and Chinese scientists, are largely rooted in the legacy of classical Marxism. Each of them has its own specifics, but they can effectively complement each other.

Keywords
human capital, human potential, creative work, creative class, post-Soviet school of critical Marxism, NIO.2, noonomics, common destiny of mankind
Acknowledgment
Исследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РФФИ и КАОН в рамках научного проекта № 21 511-93006.
Date of publication
21.03.2022
Number of purchasers
14
Views
848
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S020736760019063-8-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 21.03.2022
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. A(O)ntologiya noonomiki: chetvertaya tekhnologicheskaya revolyutsiya i ee ehkonomicheskie, sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye posledstviya / Pod obsch. red. S.D. Bodrunova // SPb: INIR. 2021. 388 s.

2. Bodrunov S.D. Gryaduschee. Novoe industrial'noe obschestvo: perezagruzka / Monografiya. Izd. 2-e, ispr. i dop. // SPb.: INIR im. S.Yu.Vitte. 312 s.

3. Bodrunov S.D. K voprosu o sravnitel'nom analize teoriya noonomiki i sotsializma // Voprosy politicheskoj ehkonomii. 2020. № 3. S. 52-66.

4. Bodrunov S.D. Noonomika / Monografiya // M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya. 2018. 432 s.

5. Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I. Global'nyj kapital / T. 2: Teoriya: Global'naya gegemoniya kapitala i ee predely // M.: LENAND. 2018.

6. Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I. Polemicheskie zametki o tselevykh aktsentakh al'ternativnoj sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskoj strategii // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2014. № 3. C. 120-131.

7. Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I. Transformatsii sotsial'noj struktury pozdnego kapitalizma: ot proletariata i burzhuazii k prekariatu i kreativnomu klassu? // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2019. № 1. S. 18-28.

8. Voejkov M.I. Gosudarstvo, tekhnologicheskaya revolyutsiya i novaya ehkonomika // Ehkonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii. 2019. № 2. S. 104-114.

9. Volkov G.N. Istoki i gorizonty progressa / Sotsiologicheskie problemy razvitiya nauki i tekhniki // Politizdat. 1976.

10. Kozlov G.A. O zakonomernostyakh razvitiya proizvoditel'nykh sil kommunisticheskoj formatsii // Kommunist. 1961. № 3. S. 28-39.

11. Pavlov M.Yu. Bogatstvo potrebnostej ili maksimizatsiya potrebleniya? // Voprosy politicheskoj ehkonomii. 2021. № 3. S. 169-182.

12. Sobolev Eh.N. Tsennostnyj aspekt razvitiya chelovecheskogo potentsiala v Rossii // Obschestvo i ehkonomika. 2021. № 12. S. 45-56.

13. Stepanova T.D. Iznos chelovecheskogo kapitala // Filosofiya khozyajstva. 2019. № 3. S. 143-148.

14. Florida R. Kreativnyj klass: lyudi, kotorye menyayut buduschee // Klassika-XXI. 2005. 430 s.

15. Khejnman S.A. Nekotorye teoreticheskie problemy material'no-tekhnicheskoj bazy kommunizma // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 1961. № 7. S. 34-48.

16. Cherkovets V.N. Kategoriya chelovecheskij kapital v obschej ehkonomicheskoj teorii: istoricheskij vzglyad i soderzhatel'noe opredelenie / Materialy nauchnoj konferentsii Ehkonomicheskie instituty sovremennoj Rossii // Kostroma. 2010. S. 96.

17. Yakovleva N.G. Sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskie transformatsii obrazovaniya v XXI veke / Monografiya / M.: ID Tret'yakov'. 2021. 286 s.

18. Becker G. S (1962). Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis // Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 70. No 5. P. 9-49.

19. Fan Qiangwei (2020). The development concept of a community with a shared future for mankind // Observe and think. No 12. P. 57-64.

20. Howkins J. (2002). The creative economy: How people make money from ideas // Penguin. UK.

21. Landry C., Bianchini F. (1995). The Creative City // Demos. Vol. 12.

22. Schultz T.W. (1971). Investment in Human Capital: the Role of Education and Research // N.Y.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate