Dating Tomb G 1111 at Giza
Dating Tomb G 1111 at Giza
Аннотация
Код статьи
S032103910015606-9-1
Тип публикации
Статья
Статус публикации
Опубликовано
Авторы
Богданов Иван Валерьевич 
Аффилиация: Institute of Oriental Manuscripts, RAS
Адрес: Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg
Страницы
634-661
Аннотация

Until recently the provenance of the offering basin known through the transcription in Urk. I, 165 remained uncertain. On the basis of a photograph from the George Andrew Reisner’s archive in the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston (Photo ID number: C10393_OS), it is possible to attribute to tomb G 1111 (Giza West Field). The present publication of the texts on the offering basin contains a number of corrections to the previous transcription by Kurt Sethe, as well as a commentary on the names and titles of the deceased and his son. Their names and titles show that both served as commanders of prospectors. A prosopography of all persons named jww-nmtj in the sources of the Old and Middle Kingdoms, as well as of the Old Kingdom holders of the office of sHD srjw “inspector of prospectors”, is compiled. In conclusion, it is suggested that the owner of the offering basin from tomb G 1111 is identical with jww-nmtj mentioned in inscription Sinai 13, which dates to the reign of Dd-kA-ra jzzj. This is currently the earliest date for a tomb in Cemetery G 1100 at Giza established through indirect synchronism.

Ключевые слова
Giza, Old Kingdom Egypt, Old Kingdom expeditions, Old Kingdom onomastics, Old Kingdom titles, Middle Kingdom onomastics
Источник финансирования
This article is a translation of: Богданов, И.В. К датировке гробницы G 1111 в Гизе. Journal of Ancient History [Vestnik drevney istorii] 81/2 (2021), 269–297. DOI: 10.31857/ S032103910014827-2.
Классификатор
Получено
28.06.2021
Дата публикации
28.06.2021
Всего подписок
11
Всего просмотров
119
Оценка читателей
0.0 (0 голосов)
Цитировать   Скачать pdf
1 Tomb G 1111 is located in south-east area of the northern part of cemetery G 1100 within the Giza West Field necropolis which is immediately adjacent to Cheops Pyramid and is the largest cemetery at Giza.
2 According to architectural appearance, iconographic style of reliefs and statuary typologies, the earliest monuments of cemetery G 1100 date to the late 4th or early 5th Dynasties1; however, most of the tombs of this group belong to the category of the secondary construction dated to the 6th Dynasty. The evidence of titles does not make possible to identify any reliable criteria for dating tombs of this cemetery before the end of the 5th Dynasty.
1. Author. Ivan V. Bogdanov – PhD (History), Research fellow, Ancient Orient department, Institute of Oriental Manuscripts, Russian Academy of Sciences.
3 Epigraphy of the group of tombs G 1100 is modest and for the most part is not published. Porter & Moss’ Topographical Bibliography provides only selected data on the tombs and monuments from this cemetery2:
2. PM III.1 1974, 55–56.
4
  • G 1104 (statue of zA=j-ms(.j)).
  • G 1105 (statue Cairo JdE 377193).
  • G 1109 (statue of mrt-jb=j).
  • G 1111 (offering basin, data reported in Porter & Moss are incorrect; see further).
  • G 1151 (the owner is nfr-qd=j).
  • G 1152 (wooden statue of a boy, unnamed).
  • G 1157 (unnamed statue).
  • G 1171 (the owner is kA=j-m-Tnnt).
3. www.gizapyramids.org: B11698_OS; B11697_OS; B11696_OS; EG010647. Hereinafter references made to website >>>> are cited with only Photo ID number. Reading the name of the owner of the statue is problematic: PM III.1 1974, 55: pt-pn-nswt; Fischer 1976, 23: «this nj-pt-nswt»; Scheele-Schweitzer 2014, 502 [2131]: Nzw-p.t-pn (?) «der König des Himmels ist er (?)».
5 All the materials found in tombs of cemetery G 1100 are now available on websites www.gizapyramids.org and giza.fas.harvard.edu. Here one can find archive photos of monuments from other tombs of this cemetery as well as those that were found on its territory. The following epigraphical materials should be added to the body of information presented in the Topographical Bibliography:
6 G 1105 and G 1107 (false door of jHj, found in the debris between these tombs)4.
4. www.gizapyramids.org: B11757_OS; B13057-01_OS. Dating: 6th Dynasty (according to his title Spsj nswt «royal nobleman»).
7 G 1107 (offering table for a group of people: smsw pr «elder of the house» nfr, mrtrt (indicator of nobility for ladies, exact meaning is uncertain) Spst, zS «scribe» wp, a woman named rwD-zAw=s, a man named prjw(?); it contains a dedication by Hm-kA «ka-servant» kAj)5.
5. www.gizapyramids.org: C10453_OS.
8
  • G 1119 (offering basin of jj-anx-n=f, see further).
  • G 1123 (false door of tbAS)6.
  • G 1152a (false door lintel of nj-kA=j-mjnw)7.
  • G 1156 (false door of ptH-Htp)8.
  • G 1162+1172 B (false door of ttj)9.
  • G 1165 (offering basin of Tntj, see further).
  • G 1177 (statue of kA=j-pw-ptH)10.
6. www.gizapyramids.org: C12692_OS; B12984_OS; C12693_OS; AAW888.

7. www.gizapyramids.org: B8584_NS.

8. www.gizapyramids.org: B7619_NS.

9. www.gizapyramids.org: C12034_OS; C11216_OS.

10. Cairo JdE 37716. Fischer 1960, 301–302, fig. 2; www.gizapyramids.org: B11753_OS; C11955_OS.
9 The bulk of attendants and officials buried at G 1100 cemetery were engaged in construction (G 1123, G 1105, G 1162+1172 B, G 1165) and organization of expeditions (G 1104, G 1111, G 1171). Two police titles (G 1171, G 1177), offices held in the corporation of xntjw-S (G 1151, G 1152a) and some others, for example, the juridical one (G 1156), are also mentioned. Inscriptions in their tombs contain only a few important indicators for their dating. Most notable is titulary of nfr-qd=j, the owner of tomb G 1151, who held the office of Hm-nTr ra m Szp(w)--ra «priest of Ra in the Sun temple Desire of the Sun»11. However, this title of a functionary in the cult of the Sun temple of king nj-wsr-ra cannot use as a reliable criterion for dating; according to other data tomb G 1151 should be dated later – to the second half of the 5th Dynasty12. Moreover, nfr-qd=j is the only known priest of Cheops (Hm-nTr xwfw) buried in cemetery G 1100.
11. PM III.1 1974, 56; the title is mentioned on the false door in situ in G 1151: www.gizapyramids.org: A6460_NS; A6478_NS, A6200_NS, A6458_NS. nfr-qd=j also held the following titles: rx nswt (n) pr-aA «king's acquaintance of the palace», Hm-nTr xwfw «priest of Cheops», wab nswt «priest of the king», Hrj-sStA «secretary», sHD xntjw-S (pr-aA) «inspector of the (palace) attendants» and jmj-rA st xntjw-S pr-aA «overseer of the bureau of the palace attendants».

12. Brovarski 2016, 86–87; cf. Nuzzolo 2018, 389–390 [74]: «Niuserre – Djedkare». A. M. Roth was inclined to identify him with nfr-qd=j, the owner of tomb G 2089 which she dated to the reigns of nj-wsr-ra – jzzj (Roth 1995, 94–95), however this dating is highly doubtful.
10 Inscriptions on the offering basin from tomb G 1111 provide an opportunity to specify the date of development of cemetery G 1100.
11

OFFERING BASIN FROM TOMB G 1111

12 First of all, it is necessary to once again clear up misunderstanding about attribution of offering basins Boston MFA 13.3282 and 13.3283 which finding place is sometime attributed to tomb G 111113. This is incorrect. According to data from the archive of G. A. Reisner, offering basin Boston MFA 13.3282 comes from G 1165 which belonged to Tntj14. jj-anx-n=f from tomb G 111915 was the owner of another offering basin, Boston MFA 13.3283.
13. PM III.1 1974, 55; Lehmann 1995, 27, 69.

14. Lehmann 1995, Taf. 24; www.mfa.org/collections/object/offering-slab-140858; www.gizapyramids.org: C11990_OS. Dating: 6th Dynasty. There was a misunderstanding, probably because of a mistake in manuscript by G. A. Reisner who specified G 1111 as a place of discovery of offering basin of Tjenti (G 1165): Reisner, G.A. A History of the Giza Necropolis III. 1942 (unpublished manuscript). [Chap.] 17: [Analytic Overview of] Cemetery G 1000–1600: [Pt.] 7: Chronology of Cemetery G 1000–1600. [Pt.] VII. P. 034 (giza.fas.harvard.edu/photos/63607/full/: UM2901). Appendix G: Cemetery G 1000–1100. P. 015 (giza.fas.harvard.edu/photos/63676/full/: UM2970).

15. www.gizapyramids.org: SC167191; see also: www.mfa.org/collections/object/offering-basin-of-iyankhenef-140860. Dating: late 6th Dynasty. The origin of the offering basin is also mentioned in Reisner’s documentation. Corrections of data from the PM III are presented on the website www.gizapyramids.org (Photo ID C11990_OS and SC167191) and on the website giza.fas.harvard.edu/sites/270/full/. See also Piacentini 2002a, 95, n. 3; 2002b, 334. The reading of the name as jj-anx=f is also likely.
13 According to documents from the archive of G. A. Reisner, another offering basin was found in G 1111 for which the following reference was made16: «Photo ID number: C10393_OS. Western Cemetery Giza; View: G 1111. Cemetery G «1100: G 1111, Photographer: George Andrew Reisner. Photo date: July 1904».
16. www.gizapyramids.org: C10393_OS; giza.fas.harvard.edu/ancientpeople/2881/full/.
14 Photograph C10393_OS of the offering basin can be found on the websites www.gizapyramids.org and giza.fas.harvard.edu. Despite this publication, so far no one has paid attention to the offering basin, although this object is of interest for many reasons.
15 Epigraphy of the offering basin has long been available through K. Sethe’s transcription in Urk. I17. According to Sethe, the text was copied by W. Spiegelberg in 1907 from an object seen at an antiquities dealer at Giza. Sethe himself made a transcription after Spiegelberg’s estampage. The offering basin was entered into the Topographical Bibliography (Porter & Moss)18 with reference to Urk. I and, as a result, actually remained non-attributed. At present it is exclusively quoted according to publication in Urk. I19.
17. Urk. I 1932–1933, 165.8–10.

18. PM III.1 1974, 310.

19. For example, Wilson 1947, 240; Strudwick 2005, 245–246; Hannig 2003, passim.
16 According to the archive photograph C10393_OS, inscriptions on the offering basin from G 1111 basically correspond to the transcription published by Sethe in Urk. I, 165.
17 Thus, the offering basin was discovered by G. A. Reisner in July 1904, and already in 1907 it was seen by W. Spiegelberg at an antiquities dealer; that is within those three years the object was simply stolen from the excavation site at Giza or from the temporary storage and reach the antiquities market. I do not know the present location of this offering basin.
18 The photograph on the website www.gizapyramids.org clarifies Sethe’s reading of the inscriptions. Corrections relate only to reading the name in the inscription on the left side of the offering basin (line 3) and the final part of the offering formula. Besides that, the title before the name on the right side is not reproduced in Urk. I at all.
19

INSCRIPTIONS

20 Transcription of the offering basin according to Urk. I, 165.4 and Urk. I, 165.8–10:
21 Note by K. Sethe: „a. So in einer andern Inschrift desselben Stei nes“.
22

23

Transcription of the offering basin according to photograph C10393_OS published on the website www.gizapyramids.org :

24
1. Right side:
2. Top:
3. Left side:
4. Bottom:
25
1. sHD srjw nj-anx=j-nmtj 1. Inspector of prospectors nj-anx=j-nmtj.
2. jmj-xt srjw nj-kA=j-ra Dd(.j) 2. Under-supervisor of prospectors nj-kA=j-ra says:
3. jrj.n=j nw n jt=j sHD srjw [j]w(w)-nmtj (j)r pr(t) n=f xrw jm 3. «I made this for my father, inspector of prospectors [j]w(w)-nmtj, that invocation offerings come forth for him therein,
4. m t Hnqt kA [Apd] (j)xt nb(t) bnrt ra nb 4. consisting of bread, beer, beef, [fowl], all sweet things every day».
26 Commentary on the offering formula
27 Line 3. jrj.n=j nw n jt=j ... (j)r pr(t) n=f xrw jm «I made this for my father..., that invocation offerings come forth for him therein». One of the customary grammatical patterns of the formula prt-xrw «invocation offering» is presented here: in pseudo-verbal construction (j)r pr(t) xrw jm «that invocation offerings come forth therein»20. As it is known, this formula in the form sDm=f is represented by two patterns: prj=f xrw «he calls» (simple sDm=f, structure: «he comes forth by the voice») and Dj=f prj xrw «he calls» (structure: «he gives so that the voice would come forth» is, in this case, analytic, compound causative build on the pattern Dj=j rx=k «I inform you, I bring to your attention» which in Middle Egyptian was also used as subjunctive: «I would like to inform you; I have to tell you»21). In the first pattern the subject of «calling out» is a person while in the second pattern the voice itself is «coming forth». Such inversion of subjects of relationship for the verb prj «to come» is also reflected in the passive form sDm.tj=f: prj.tj xrw «(someone is) calling» (structure: «(someone is) coming out by the voice»). The formula in the infinitive pr(t) xrw is often used as a fixed expression which simply means «invocation, appeal» (to the deceased). Two directions of an action, however, still remain in its grammatical structure: it can be interpreted both as «coming forth by the voice» and as «coming forth of the voice». In our case the ritual appeal to the deceased is realized through inscriptions on the offering basin.
20. Clère 1935–1938, 771–773; Barta 1968, 26; Lapp 1986, 91–110, § 155–326, in particular 97–104, § 168–184.

21. About this form, also attested in Old Egyptian, see Luft 1984, 103–111.
28 Line 4. (j)xt nb(t) bnrt ra nb «...all sweet things every day». For a long time, this phrase has been considered the only example of plene spelling of the word nbt «all, any» after jxt «thing» in combination (j)xt nb(t) «everything» that in the Old Kingdom always loses the ending -t in the word nb(t): 22. Since this example was only written in Sethe’s transcription in Urk. I, 165.10, it has raised serious doubts23. The concerns proved justified: according to the photograph C10393_OS from Reisner archive, here isn't merely jxt nbt «everything», but the combination (j)xt nb(t) bnrt «all sweet things» which is well known from the formulae on other monuments24. The feminine ending -t in Sethe’s transcription relates precisely to the word bnrt missed by him. Likewise, the preposition n in the transcription in Urk. I, 165.10 should be corrected to determinative pl. «3 grains» for the word bnrt «sweet».
29 Commentary on the names
30 Three names are mentioned on the offering basin: nj-anx=j-nmtj, [j]w(w)-nmtj and nj-kA=j-ra.
31 Following Sethe, the name of the deceased in the third line of the declaration is traditionally restored as [nj-anx]-nmtj based of the perfectly preserved name nj-anx=j-nmtj in the first line (the right side). Nevertheless, as a matter of fact, this name is to be read as [j]w(w)-nmtj, which does not preclude from assuming that named on the right-hand sHD srjw «overseer of prospectors» nj-anx=j-nmtj is still identical with him. Turns out the owner of the offering basin had two names with the element nmtj, the name of the god-wanderer, patron of travelers25.
25. About the god nmtj see Berlev 1969, 3–30; Graefe 1980, 1–27, 43–46, 49; Leitz 2002, 242–244.
32 Both anthroponyms with divine name nmtj as a component are rare26.
26. For the Old Kingdom names with the component nmtj: Ranke 1935, 69–70; 1952, 36. Bland, Malek 1977, 119–120; Thirion 1985, 142; Scheele-Schweitzer 2014, Nr. [173], [765], [913], [1364], [1546], [1553], [1612], [1652], [1904], [1934], [1968], [2065]–[2068], [2585], [2723], [3311].
33 1. The name nj-anx=j-nmtj «my life belongs to the god nmtj» is built according to typical Old Egyptian pattern nj-anx=j-NN «my life belongs to (king or god) NN» or «NN owns my life». The following evidence of the name nj-anx=j-nmtj27 are mentioned in the literature:
27. Bland, Malek 1977, 119–120; Scheele-Schweitzer 2014, 419 [1546].
34 1.1. . False door Stockholm, Medelhavsmuseet, 1140628. Hypocoristic: nj29. Titles: jmj-rA mSa «general», rx nswt «king's acquaintance», [aD-mr grg]t mrr nb=f «[administrator of settlement], beloved by his lord», xrp wabw nswt Axt-[xwfw] «director of king's priests of the pyramid Horizon [of Cheops]». His eldest son and heir (zA=f smsw jwaw=f) jj-m-Htp had similar titles: sHD wjA «captain (of crew) of the ship», xrp (j)m(jw)-zA «director of the members of a phyle»30, aD-mr grgt «administrator of settlement», xrp wabw nswt «director of king's priests». According to the titles, both relatives served in the river fleet, organizing expeditions.
35 1.2. . Relief Cairo CG 147931. The example is doubtful as neither photograph nor the drawing of the inscription are published. This man was Hm-kA «funerary priest» of rn-(j)rj, father of leather worker wtA. H. Ranke read his name as nj-anx-zkr32. К. Scheele-Schweitzer gives a combined reading N(.j)-anx-Hn.w/Nm.tj «Besitzer von Leben ist die Hn.w-Barke/Nemti» with a note: «M.E. ist die Lesung als N(.j)-anx-Nm.tj hier zu bevorzugen»33. Doubts about the name reading are related to multiple meaning of sign given by L. Borchardt, which is open to different readings: nmtj, zkr, or Hnw «Sokar's boat»34. The reading nj-anx=j-zkr «my life belongs to Sokar»35 is based only on credence to Borchardt’s transcription; if it is right, then the sign is the ideographic name of the god Sokar. However, Sokar's name was not written with a single ideogram like Hnw, so nmtj is the preferred reading.
36 1.3. On the offering basin published in Urk. I, 165 which is the subject of this study.
37 Thus, there are only two reliable evidences for the name nj-anx=j-nmtj in the Old Kingdom, and one of them is preserved exactly on the offering basin from G 1111.
38 2. Name jww-nmtj occurs more often, it has been attested both in the Old36 and the Middle Kingdoms. By a strange coincidence it is not listed in H. Ranke’s Personennamen. Scheele-Schweitzer’s Handbuch cites the following data on this anthroponym:
36. Scheele-Schweitzer 2014, 222 [173].
39 2.1. jww-nmtj. Inscription Hatnub Gr. 2.7 dating back to ttj37. Title: jmj-rA S «overseer of the lake (i. e. the contingent of soldiers and craftsmen and their locations)»38. The reading of the name is doubtful. Hieratic original after G. Möller’s copy: .
40 2.2. jww-nmtj. Inscription Hatnub Gr. 3.2 dated to «year of the 14th occasion (of the counting)» i. e. 27/28th regnal year of king Hr nTrj-xaw (ppj II)39. Title: xtmtj-nTr «treasurer of the god». He was the expedition chief and the author of the inscription. His identity with the first jww-nmtj who lived under the reign of ttj is hardly possible as two graffiti are separated by 27 years.
41 2.3. jww-nmtj. Inscription in Wadi Maghara40. Title: jmj-rA sr(jw) «overseer of prospectors». It dates back to rnpt m-xt zp 4 Tnwt jHw awt nb «year after the 4th occasion of the counting all the large and small cattle», i. e. 8th/9th regnal year of king Dd-kA-ra jzzj.
42 2.4. jww-nmtj. The name is attested on one or two figurines from the series of so-called Execration texts of the Old Kingdom41. Altogether, four pots with the Execration texts containing 435 names of rebellious Nubians and Egyptians (some of them duplicated) were discovered at Giza. Dating marks going back to year (m)-xt zp-5 «after the 5th occasion (of the counting)» i. e. to 10th/11th regnal year of unknown king remained on three pots, and namely:
43 1. Pot of series AB: (m)-xt zp 5 Abd 3 prt hrw 29 «year after the 5th occasion (of the counting), 3rd month of the seed season, 29th day»42;
42. Abu Bakr, Osing 1973, 131, Taf. 31–32. The earliest case of spelling of the word «day of month» in the form zjw/zw (Wb. IV, 57.8–58.1; Meeks 1998, I, 309, 77.3422) dates back to the 11th Dynasty (stela of rdjw-Xnmw: Cairo CG 20543, line 14 (Lange, Schäfer 1908, 166). Dendera; cf. Schenkel 1965, 113, Anm. i); possibly, this word was derived from verb zj «pass on» and initially sounded as (j)z(j)w «time, period» (Osing 1976b, I, 113; II, 588, Anm. 512). Existence of the word zw «day of month» in the Old Kingdom is actually doubtful (cf. Edel 1955–1964, 182, § 420; Hannig 2003, 1079–1080; 2006, 2118–2120); in this regard, hereinafter I propose for the ideogram «calendar day» conditional reading hrw rather than sw which became almost generally accepted.
44 2. Pot of series J: (m)-xt zp-5 Abd 3 prt hrw 22 «year after the 5th occasion (of the counting), 3rd month of the seed season, 22nd day»43;
43. Junker 1947, 31, Abb. 8, Taf. 6b; Abu Bakr, Osing 1973, 131.
45 3. Pot of series RK: (m)-xt zp 5 Abd 2 prt hrw 5 «year after the 5th occasion (of the counting), 2nd month of the seed season, 5th day»44.
44. Osing 1976a, 154–155, Taf. 52.
46 According to these data the ritual, in the course of which the pots were buried, lasted over 55 days (from at least Abd 2 prt hrw 5 «5th day of 2nd month of the seed season» to Abd 3 prt hrw 29 «29th day of 3rd month of the seed season»). I think that burial of the figurines with the names of Nubian rebels at Giza was the result of the punitive campaign of king mrj.n-ra to Nubia which was accomplished in his 9th/10th regnal year. Campaign rock inscriptions, devoted to that event, contain the following dates from the reign of mrj.n-ra45: zp 5 Tnwt Abd 2 Smw hrw 24 «year of the 5th occasion of the counting, 2nd month of the harvest season, 25th day»46, and zp 5 Tnwt Abd 2 Smw hrw 28 «year of the 5th occasion of the counting, 2nd month of the harvest season, 28th day»47. If one accepts dating of the figurines with the Execration texts to the reign of mrj.n-ra, that means that they were made 6-8 months later than the above-mentioned graffiti48. During that period of time (between 2nd month of the harvest season of year of the 5th occasion of the counting and 2nd month of the seed season of year after the 5th occasion of the counting) king mrj.n-ra reached Nubia, defeated rebels, drew up a list of those who had been slain or executed, came back and performed the rite of burying the pots with the figurines of the rebels at Giza. The name jww-nmtj is typical exactly for the expedition members; thus, that military man or prospector repeatedly visited Nubia in the line of duty. Most of the rebels, listed on the occasion of their rebellion suppression, had Nubian names49, and only a few dozen held Egyptian names50, at that Nubians with Egyptian names were singled out as a special group since they were clarified by the title nHsj «Nubian»51, though not always. Some persons were of the mixed descent52 which attests to the long-term contacts between Egyptians and Nubians. This impressive union of Nubians and Egyptians was in vassal dependence on Egypt for a long period of time, however for unknown reasons they rose in rebellion at the end of the reign of mrj.n-ra. Egyptian jww-nmtj probably was a member of the expeditionary contingent in Nubia that became involved in the native rebellion and paid for that.
45. Third inscription (Urk. I 1932–1933, 111; between Aswan and Philae) does not include any date.

46. Kaiser et al. 1976, 79; Seidlmayer 2005, 290–291, Anm. 11, Taf. 6b. Rock niche of the temple of Satet on Elephantine Island. The name of king nfr-kA-ra without indication of the regnal year is also attested herein.

47. Urk. I 1932–1933, 110.10–16. Island of Hesse, the First Cataract of the Nile.

48. Inscription Hatnub VI (Anthes 1928, 14, Taf. 5 = Urk. I 1932–1933, 256.18) also dates to the year after the 5th occasion of the counting (10th/11th regnal year) of mrj.n-ra.

49. Osing 1976a, 160–164.

50. Osing 1976a, 158–159, 164.

51. Osing 1976a, 159–160. Remarkable example: leader («foreign ruler», HqA-xAst) of all rebels had the Egyptian name anx-wnjs «wnjs will live»; his Nubian name was jAtrAs (Abu Bakr, Osing 1973, 112–113 [199], Taf. 52-53).

52. This fact is established by the filiation data: Osing 1976a, 160.
47 This list of holders of the name jww-nmtj should be supplemented with the data collected by Michelle Thirion53:
53. Thirion 2003, 178.
48 2.5. jww-nmtj. A gift bearer with the title smr «courtier»54.
49 2.6. jww-nmtj. Statue Liverpool, World Museum, 1967.455. He held the office of jmj-rA st xntjw-S pr-aA «overseer of the bureau of the palace attendants» and was the son of the statue owner, jmj-rA mSa «military commander» and jmj-jrtj «captain» sbk-Htp, who also held the ritual title jmAxw xr nmtj «revered with nmtj»56. According to this title, both of them were natives of the 18th (Sharuna – el-Kom el-Ahmar/Sawaris)57, 12th (Deir el-Gebrawi – El-Atawla) or 10th nomes of Upper Egypt where the cult of the god nmtj was practiced. Another son of sbk-Htp, also named sbk-Htp, was jmAxw xr st-jrt nb Ddw jnpw nb spA nmtj nb Tbt «revered with Osiris lord of Busiris, Anubis lord of Sepa, and Nemty lord of Qau». If my reading of the settlement name as Tbt «bottoms of the feet» (having in mind the cut off clows of the god nmtj) is correct, then it is the first occurrence of the name of the city Antaeopolis (Tbw), and it is about that the god nmtj which cult localized in the 10th nome of Upper Egypt.
50 2.7. jw(w)-nmtj-wr{t}58. This masculine name is sometimes read as jwt-nmtj or nmtj-jwt59, however, judging from the photograph, it should be exactly read as jw(w)-nmtj-wr{t}, i. e. jw(w)-nmtj Elder (with the false feminization of the epithet wr «Elder» because of a mistake made when transferring the hieratic text into stone60). This person is shown in the bottom register of the stela: his name was chiseled while several columns of the text, preceding it, were written in ink – nowadays, these inscriptions are completely lost. Name and title of the owner of the stela are written on the top in a mixture of hieratic and ideographic script, and the ideographic inscription on the arch of the stela changes the writing direction and the order of signs several times. The owner held the office of jmj-rA zA n Xrtjw-nTr «overseer of a phyle of the craftsmen of the necropolis», and his name is probably also to be read jw(w)-nmtj-wr. If this is so, then the owner was depicted on the stela two times. The boy with the title zA=s «her son», standing behind the mother, also bears the name in honor of the god nmtj: nmtj-nxt. Such propensity of the family for the cult of the god nmtj makes it possible to assume that it originated from the 13th or 18th nome of Upper Egypt.
51 Several other names should be added to these data:
52 2.8. jww-nmtj. Graffito in Gebel Abrak (Eastern Desert)61. Title: jmj-rA 10 srjw smntjw «overseer of the ten prospectors and guides»62.
53 2.9.1. jw(w)-nmtj63>>>> >>>> ). Many members of this family are also depicted on stela Leiden, Rijksmuseum van Oudheden, CI.325 (or Leiden V 111: PM VIII.3 2007, 166 (803-030-039); Boeser 1909, 7 [21], Taf. 20). Dating: early 12th Dynasty..png" class="image-formula"/>. A servant of jAm, the owner of the stela. O. D. Berlev revealed three cases of scriptiones plenae of the divine name nmtj in anthroponyms on this stela: nmtj-anx(=f) fem. (twice) and nmtj-anx=f masc.64, however the name jw(w)-nmtj with the same scriptio plena Berlev read simply as nmtj, although the sign «legs» in it is obvious: .
54 2.9.2–3. The name jw(w)-nmtj in the similar form was also attested on stelae Cairo CG 20520 (masc.)65 and Rio de Janeiro, Museu Nacional, 627 [2419] (fem.)66. This name was included in Ranke’s Personennamen as an alternative to the simple name nmtj in scriptio plena67 (Adams 2010, 5–7, fig. 4–5).]]]. The name nmtj without the ‘falcon on a boat’ ideogram on the other stelae should also be understood as the divine name nmtj adopted as the personal name68 considering to the parallels on the other stelae or to the names of the relatives (for example, the name nmtj-Htp on stela Cairo CG 2060569, nmtj-wr on stela Cairo CG 2052070) on stela Cairo CG 20520 and jmj-rA pr «householder» nmtj-wr () on stela Leiden, Rijksmuseum van Oudheden, L.XI.2 (Leiden V 108: Boeser 1909, 13 [50], Taf. 38; Simpson 1974, pl. 16 (ANOC 7.2) are apparently the same person (Franke 1984, 217 (325)).]]], Antaeopolite names on stela Cairo CG 2059171). This is why the sign «legs» could also not be the determinative for the hypothetic name nmtj «wanderer» from the verb nmt «walk, wander»: the name nmtj always meant only the god-wanderer. Although, on rare occasions, the divine name nmtj is presented only by the ideogram «legs» with the phonetic complements ()72, the sign after the ideogram of the falcon-god on a boat was not reliably attested. In this regard, I distinguish the name from the simple name nmtj in scriptio plena and read it as jw(w)-nmtj despite the fact that the element jw(w) is presented in it as a single sign “legs”, i. e. in the form which does not occur in the full variants of the name jw(w)-nmtj.
55 2.10. jww-nmtj-wr (т.е. jww-nmtj Elder). Stela Sinai 8573.
56 Spelling the name in inscriptions Abrak (2.8) and Sinai 85 (2.10) is of interest. In the first case the writer violated the rule of pronouncing the divine name honoris causa, in the second case the component jww is presented in the full form. Thus, it is necessary to read the name as jww-nmtj «coming of nmtj» where jww is nomen actionis from the verb jwj «come». The word jww «coming»74 means the child himself who impersonated «appearance» (of a certain god) before the father.
74. About «coming (of the god)»: Hannig 2006, 100. For example, appearance of the god Sobek signifies the renaissance in the shrines of the gods - inhabitants of the Underworld (jmjw-dwAt) and inhabitants of waves (jmjw-nwj): xaj sbk wHm.n=f mswt m jww=f jp nfrw «when Sobek appears, he revives by his coming (everyone) in particular and in general» (pRamesseum VI (BM EA 10759), col. 116–117: Gardiner 1957, 53, pl. 3; cf. Vernus 1980, 118; Assmann 1999, 462. Dating: jmn-m-HAt III). In this text, the terms jp / nfrw are a combination of opposites with the meaning “particular / general” or “special / common”.
57 The reading of the name as jww-nmtj is confirmed by several examples of the names from the Old and the Middle Kingdoms that were formed on the similar principle - with the initial nomen actionis from the verb jwj «come». This pattern coexisted with the similar derivatives in the form sDm=f or with a pseudo-participle from the verb jwj. The following examples of the names with nomen actionis jww/jwt «coming» can be found in the anthroponymy of the Old and the Middle Kingdoms:
58 1. jww-bA «coming of the sacred Ram»75. Double waw indicates the form nomen actionis from the verb jwj «come».
59 2. jww-bnw «coming of phoenix». Two individuals are known who have that name attested in the different spelling: 1) 76 and 2) 77.
60 3. jww-ptH. This name in the form nomen actionis is mentioned on a stela of the First Intermediate Period78. A similar name, but in a different form, is attested in the Second Intermediate Period: ptH-jw.j where jw.j is a pseudo-participle79 with the reading ptH-jw.j.]]].
61 4. jwt-n=j-ptH «coming of Ptah to me» masc.80 where the word jwt «coming» (in the feminine gender) was formed according to another model of nomen actionis81.
62 5. jw(w)-n=j-sbk «coming of Sobek to me»82 where the word jww «coming» is nomen actionis with the w-ending as in the name jww-nmtj83. Nomen actionis is used in the names No. 4 and 5 instead of the simple sDm=f form (as in the name pattern jj-n=j-NN «NN came to me»84).
63 6. jww-wp(j)-wAwt «coming of Wepwawet», he is also known by the name nfr-jww «good coming» which his father also held85. The variant nfr-jww with the epithet nfr «good» confirms the meaning of the word jww «coming» as nomen actionis once more. The Middle Kingdom names of this type with the element nfr were divided into two patterns: nfr-jww86 and jww-nfr «good coming»87, to which adjoined the name jww-nfrt «coming of the beauty»88. The name jww-nfr/ nfr-jww occurs dozens of times in the Middle Kingdom, both for men and women. On the contrary, the equally widespread name jww-nfrt occurs only for women and only in the Middle Kingdom. Its Old Kingdom prototype nfrt-jww=s «beauty, (this is) her coming»89 gives more reason to see the goddess Hathor in this «beauty». This explains the constant carrying forward the word nfrt «beauty» in the Middle Kingdom name jww-nfrt whereas position of the verb nfr «be good» in the name jww-nfr/ nfr-jww is not stable; thus, the name patterns of jww-nfr/ nfr-jww (masc./fem.) and jww-nfrt (only fem.) are not equivalent. The name pattern with pseudo-participle nfrt-jj.tj «the beauty is coming» (Nefertiti) on the Middle Kingdom material is not attested. In this name, as before, Hathor is the deity who is hiding under the name nfrt «beauty»90, which appeared during the 18th Dynasty and survived into the Ptolemaic period (also in the form tA-nfr(t)-jj.tj).
64 7. nfr-jww-Hwt-Hr «coming of Hathor is good»91. The female name in which jww «coming» can be understood only as nomen actionis.
65 A compound name jmn-m-HAt-nfr-jw(w)92 is also known, however in this case nfr-jw(w) is only the second name of the man93.
92. Stela Coll. Figeac (Marseille): Gauthier-Laurent 1933, 75–80, pl. 7.

93. Vernus 1971, 196 (13); Vernus 1986, 8 (19).
66 The feminine names Hwt-Hr-jw(j).t(j) «Hathor is coming»94 and sxt-jw(j).t(j) «Sekhet (Field-goddess) is coming»95 should be considered as pseudo-participial constructions, built according to a name pattern with the masculine subject kA=j-jw(j.j)/ kA=j-jw(j).w «my Ka is coming», with the element kA in the initial position96. Generally, the sign «legs» in the name Hwt-Hr-jj.tj / Hwt-Hr-jw(j).tj97 was made purposely more complicated to the sign jj (), since in the name form jww/jwt «coming» this sign was never used, only the sign jw (); on the contrary, this simple sign jw () was sometimes used to form a pseudo-participle - for example, the name Hwt-Hr-jw(j).tj «Hathor is coming» on stela Louvre C 11198>>>> Dating: 13th Dynasty. The owner of the stela kkj held a rare title jrj-xtm(j)t «he who is in charge of the sealed property» (Hannig 2006, 346) which existed within the community of low-rank court administration from the end of the 5th and during the 6th Dynasties (Jones 2000, 334 (1231); Hannig 2003, 179–180; Bogdanov 2017b, 166–167; the title is also attested on the false door of sbk-Htp in tomb G 2420 ( >>>> : A7580_NS. A7588_NS); on the sealings Dd-kA-ra 27 and 30 (Kaplony 1981, IIA, 330–331, 333–334; IIB, Taf. 89–90), and on the false door of qdw (Cairo CG 57196 = SR 2/15892; Kamal El-din 2009, 19–26. Saqqara (?). Dating: 8th – 9th Dynasties. This person, who held the office of jrj-xtm(j)t (pr-aA) «he who is in charge of the sealed property (of the palace)», was also jmj-xt xntjw-S pr-aA, sHD xntjw-S pr-aA and xntj-S of the pyramid mn-nfr-mrj-ra; he should be added, under No. 8, to the list of holders of the combined offices of xntjw-S and jrj-xtm(j)t in Bogdanov 2017b, 166–167)). In the narrative context, the title jrj-xtmt «contract holder (?)» is attested in the inscription on the statue base of Hr-jr-aA, line 13 (Perdu 2016, 92–93, 115, n. ao), pl. 10. Dating: psmTk II nfr-jb-ra)..png" class="image-formula"/> is presented in the full writing: . Thus, the pseudo-participle from the verb jwj in this name is presented in two forms: jj.tj and jw(j).tj «she is coming» which also occurs in other names.
67 Taking into account the anthroponymic material, military officers, expedition members and travelers often held the name jww-nmtj which indicated that they followed footsteps of their fathers who served in the same professional sphere. A separate group is made up of those born in the 10th, 12th or 18th nomes of Upper Egypt (Nos. 2.6, 2.7, 2.9.1-2, 3(?)) who got their names with the component nmtj out of reverence for the local god of their nomes, the Falcon on a boat.
68 3. Author of the inscription on the offering basin, son of jww-nmtj, had the name nj-kA=j-ra «my Ka belongs to Ra».
69 This name was fairly common in the Old Kingdom. Scheele-Schweitzer’s Handbuch provides data about eight bearers of this name99. Besides them, the following persons are known:
99. Scheele-Schweitzer 2014, 443 [1698].
70 3.1. Spsj nswt jmj-rA qdw «king's nobleman, overseer of builders» nj-kA=j-ra, father of jmAx(w)t «revered» TTj100. His correspondence to sHD qdw, sHD Hmw-kA «inspector of builders, inspector of funerary priests» nj-kA=j-ra, a servant of jj-mrj, owner of tomb G 6020101, remains questionable since presence of the title Spsj nswt «king's nobleman» for nj-kA=j-ra on the offering basin is a clear evidence in favour of dating to at least the reign of ttj while usually tomb G 6020 (jj-mrj) is reasonably dated to the first half of the 5th Dynasty.
100. Offering basin from tomb G 6027 A (www.gizapyramids.org, Field number: 38-2-13).

101. Weeks 1994, 51, fig. 42 {2.120}.
71 3.2. nj-kA=j-ra, son of xaj-mrr-nbtj, grandson of xwfw-snb and Hnwt=sn102.
102. www.gizapyramids.org: PDM_06135; PDM_06142; Giza Abu Bakr Cemetery. Dating: 5th Dynasty.
72 Commentary on the titles
73 Two titles from the sphere of the organization of expeditions are attested on the offering basin:
74 1. nj-kA=j-ra: jmj-xt srjw «under-supervisor of prospectors».
75 2. nj-anx=j-nmtj / jww-nmtj: sHD srjw «inspector of prospectors».
76 Range of problems connected with interpretation of the lexical item srj «presage, forecast, predict» etc.103 Social designations from the sphere of lexicography of srj deserve a separate study; this is why for the present I limit myself to categorical conclusions on the initial results of my own study which hopefully shall be completed soon.
103. Cannuyer 2010, passim.
77 Considering the meaning of the word sr(j) «official, office-holder»104, many scholars interpreted the term sr(j)w in the expedition titles as «officials»105. However, it should be noted that actually the office sr(j) «official» did not existed in the Old Kingdom. The term sr(j) in Old Egyptian was used in the meaning derived from the verb «envisage», however with many nuances depending on occupation of the holder: «auditor, controller, agent, informer, scout». In most of the narrative contexts (i. e. outside the titulary) it appeared as a general notion sr(j) «official» with the non-determined content. The title sr(j) transformed into a functional office only in the expedition nomenclature where to it was included with the meaning «geological explorer, prospector». It occurs mostly in the hierarchical titles jmj-rA sr(j)w / sHD sr(j)w «overseer / inspector of prospectors».
104. Wb. IV, 188.3–189.9; Jones 2000, 909 (3331); Cannuyer 2010, 577–579.

105. Goelet 1982, 200–201 (n. 199); Fischer 1985, 31; Eichler 1993, 169; Martin-Pardey 1994, 159–160, 162; Moreno García 1997, 108; Jones 2000, 229–230 (849–851), 909 (3331–3335), 966–967 (3564–3565), et al.
78 The contingents of srjw often appear in the titles together with the crew of smntjw which is indicative of resemblance of their functions. And because smntjw are usually determined as «guides»106, then for the title srjw a suitable equivalent is «prospectors»; it is derived from the verb sr(j) in the meaning «survey the routes, plot the sailing directions» which were widely used, in particular, in the Coffin Texts. Units of «prospectors»-srjw were generally a part of the expeditionary force in the quarries of the Sinai, Wadi Hammamat, Hatnub, Nubia and other remote locations. Nevertheless, according to the titles of their superiors, srjw could serve in the Nile valley as well. Functions of such srjw in Egypt itself, probably, were to accompany goods and to send reports along the routes that were plotted by them, while outside of the Nile valley they were conducting the prospecting. The ordinary srjw and smntjw, along with different categories of soldiers and craftsmen, had a very modest status, so there are almost no inscriptions of them107.
106. The title-nisba smntj is apparently derived from the word smnt «knapsack, bag» (Wb. IV, 135.18; Yoyotte 1975, 44–55; Jones 2000, 228–230 (846–851), 872 (3191); 891 (3262), 966 (3563); Mostafa 2014, 156, fig. 21, 158, 165, n. g, 166, n. b).

107. Data about the single title smntj of Middle Kingdom, presented in Rainer Hannig’s dictionary, are either incorrect (for example, on stela Cairo CG 20457 it is the personal name mnjw, cf. Fischer 1996a, 177) or doubtful (for example, on stela «cCassirer» (Schlögl 1978, 49, 155; cf. Meeks 1998, II, 327, 78.3547) a title of musician is mentioned, most probably, it means «castanets or sistrum player» (srwj?/sxmj?) rather than smntj), or represent the group spelling (Hannig 2006, 2212 {28076}). About the ordinary title srj: Tallet 2012a, I, 218–219, II, 154 (CCIS 247).
79 1. The title jmj-xt srjw «under-supervisor of prospectors».
80 I chose for the rank jmj-xt (literally meaning «one who follows, one who goes after») the conditional translation «under-supervisor»108. This rank was the second in the phyle of employees directly after «inspector» sHD. In the Middle Kingdom the hierarchic rank jmj-xt disappeared from almost all government bodies, apart from the police: it remained only as part of the title jmj-xt zAw-prw «under-supervisor of policemen (or gendarmes, literally «sons of the house(s)»)»109.
108. Jones 2000, 282–298 (1017–1090); Hannig 2003, 130–132.

109. Jones 2000, 296 (1081): «under-supervisor of sons-of-houses (police)»; Hannig 2003, 132; 2006, 240–241.
81 The title jmj-xt srjw «under-supervisor of prospectors» held by the author of the inscription, nj-kA=j-ra, is unique. The only parallel to it from the sphere of organization of the expeditions, is the office of jmj-xt smntjw «under-supervisor of guides» which occurs very rarely as well:
82 1. In graffito of Htpw in the form jmj-xt smntjw mrr nb=f «under-supervisor of guides beloved of his lord»110.
110. Wadi Hammamat M 156: Couyat, Montet 1912, 93, pl. 33; see also photographs of the inscriptions on the website ancienegypte.fr/ouadi_hammamat/page2.htm (45.jpg). To the reading of the inscription: Bogdanov 2018, 239, n. 75.
83 2. On a sealing with the name of king [Hr] wsr-xaw from Buhen111.
111. Kaplony 1981, IIA, 227; IIB, Taf. 69 (nfr-ir-kA-ra 28). See also fragments of the title jmj-xt smntjw (?): Kaplony 1981, IIB, Taf. 16 (ra-xa-f 16); 46 (mn-kAw-ra 39); 64 (sAHw-ra 44); 132 (K.u. 138); 133 (K.u. 139); about reading cf. IIA, 124–125, 204, 500.
84 3. On a sealing with the name of king Hr Dd-xaw, Dd-kA-ra from Edfu in the form [jmj]-xt smntjw jrr wDt nb=f «under-supervisor of guides who does what his lord commands»112.
112. Moeller, Marouard 2020, 16.
85 The unique title in Wadi Hammamat, published in transcription as jmj-xt mSa «under-supervisor of army»113, should most likely be read as jmj-xt smntjw «under-supervisor of guides”.
113. Wadi Hammamat M 161: Couyat, Montet 1912, 93 (without photograph); cf. Jones 2000, 287–288 (1044).
86 The only known namesake of nj-kA=j-ra served in the administration of the contingent of srjw is wr mDw Smaw zS «great (among) the tens of Upper Egypt, scribe»114 nj-kA=j-ra. He left behind many monuments115, and his titulary is exclusively rich with offices from different spheres of activity116. He was a priest Hm-nTr of kings [sAH]w-[ra], Hr [wsr-xa]w (nfr-jrj-kA-ra), Hr st-jb-tAwj (nj-wsr-ra) and Hm-nTr ra «priest of the Sun» in the Sun temples [st]-jb-[ra] (of king nfr-jrj-kA-ra) and Szp(w)-jb-ra (of king nj-wsr-ra). The main activity nj-kA=j-ra related to the ministry of food where he held several offices117: [jmj-rA] Snwtj «overseer of the (department of) two granaries», [jmj-rA] zSw mDAt n(j) Snwt «overseer of scribes of documents for the (department of) granary», jmj-rA Snwt n(j)t Xnw «overseer of the (department of) granary for residence», Xrj-tp Snwt «overseer of the (department of) granary», sHD zSw Snwt «inspector of scribes of the (department of) granary»118. The title jmj-rA Snwt «overseer of the (department of) granary» was also held by his son anx-m-a-ra. nj-kA=j-ra himself was also involved into organization of cattle breeding and hunting which is evidenced by such his titles as jmj-rA Hwt-aAt «overseer of the great estate», jmj-rA Hwt-jHwt «overseer of the estate for the cattle breeding (with the town determinative)», jmj-rA Apdw-S «overseer of pond-fowl»119, jmj-rA pHww nb «overseer of all marshlands», jmj-rA nww nb «overseer of all hunters», jmj-rA bjtjw nb «overseer of all bee-keepers»120. Such unusual offices as jmj-rA (Xrjw)-sbA nb «overseer of all parasol bearers»121 and jmj-rA msw nswt (prw) m prwj «overseer of the (houses of) king's children in the two houses» can also be added into this group.
114. Another reading of the title: Jones 2000, 845–846 (3085) (zS wr(w) 10 Smaw). The element zS «scribe» in this title should be considered as a functional addition to wr mDw Smaw «great (among) the tens of Upper Egypt».

115. PM III.2 1981, 696–697. The monuments of nj-kA=j-ra include: 1-2. Statue Cleveland Museum of Art 1964.90 and fragments of false door Cleveland Museum of Art 1964.91 (Andreu 1997, 21–30; Fischer 1997, 178–179; Hamza Awad 2006, 73–87; Berman, Bohač 1999, 128–132 (71–72); >>>> ; >>>> ); 3. Statue Brooklyn 49.215 (James 1974, 13 (36), pl. 19; >>>> ); 4–5. Statues New York, MMA 52.19 and 48.67 (www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/543900; >>>> ). Probably from Saqqara. Dating: nj-wsr-ra.

116. About titles of nj-kA=j-ra see also Baud 1999, II, 481, no. 103 (V 6); Nuzzolo 2018, 360–361 [51]; Florès 2015, 417 (Ni/Sa/1).

117. The Old Kingdom «overseers of the granary / two granaries» performed the functions of the agriculture ministers. This office was reliably attested from the beginning of the 5th Dynasty (Strudwick 1985, 251–275).

118. The title Xrj-tp Snwt «chief of the (department of) granary» is mentioned on statues Cleveland Museum of Art 1964.90, New York, MMA 52.19 and 48.67; the titles rx nswt «king's acquaintance» and sHD zSw Snwt «inspector of scribes of the (department of) granary» is attested only on statue Brooklyn 49.215.

119. For the reading Apdw-mr/S «channel-bird, pond-fowl» see Hayes 1951a, 53, fig. 13 (170–181); 1951b, 92–93; Wassell 1991, II, 27–28, n. 98; Bailleul-LeSuer 2016, 29, 341, 377–378, 381. Cf. Andreu 1997, 22; Fischer 1997, 178; Jones 2000, 52 (258); Diego Espinel 2006, 87; Hamza Awad 2006, 75, 80; Nuzzolo 2018, 360: everyone is reading the title as sS(.w)?, or as Apd(w), or as Apd(w)-mr/S. Reading in Florès 2015, 417: «(j)m(y)-r(A) sA mr ?».

120. Reading in Hamza Awad 2006, 75, 78: «jmj-rA [...] bjt nb(.w)?» is incorrect.

121. Cf. readings in Hamza Awad 2006, 75, 78: «jmj-rA sb[...] nb(.w)?»; Nuzzolo 2018, 360: «imy-r sb(w) […] nb(w)»; Florès 2015, 417: «(j)m(y)-r(A) sb [... ?] nb». About this title: Bogdanov, Bolshakov 2004, 23; this article was afterwards reprinted in English: Bolshakov 2005, 47, n. j).
87 The title jmj-rA srjw on false door Cleveland 1964.91 looks unusual122; writing of the word srj by only the ideogram of the official without any phonetic complement is reliably attested only in inscription Sinai 19 written by sHD srjw «inspector of prospectors» snnw jdw123. Nevertheless, the title jmj-rA srjw on false door Cleveland 1964.91 apparently has nothing to do with the organization of expeditions. The titulary of nj-kA=j-ra is in many respects similar to the titulary of dmD124 who also held the office of jmj-rA srjw and also was jmj-rA zS «overseer of the fowling pool» (the sense of the title is not known), jmj-rA Snjw-tA nb «overseer of all vegetation», jmj-rA pHww «overseer of marshlands», jmj-rA wHaw «overseer of fowlers/fishermen» and a priest of the Sun (Hm-nTr ra) in the Sun temples sxt(-ra) (of king sAHw-ra) and st-jb-(ra) (of king nfr-jrj-kA-ra)125.
88 According to these indirect data, the office of jmj-rA srjw held by dmD and nj-kA=j-ra was probably related to the management of auditors126 or guides127. Needless to say, that the bosses themselves did not participated in the trips - their status did not allow them. Here, as in the expedition inscriptions, the title srjw - in broad sense «informer, prospector, auditor, researcher» - has one meaning but different content. In Egypt srjw could play a role of attendants of the military or fiscal missions, and in expeditions the many professional miners and prospectors were called by the same title.
126. Fischer 1968, 101, n. 458; 1996b, 10 (j); edict Coptus R (Cairo JdE 41894: Weill 1912, 59–67, pl. 4 [1], 9; Urk. I, 1932–1933, 306.2–8; Goedicke 1967, 214–215, 222, Abb. 28); The Instruction for king Merikara E 85-87 / M VI.5-6 (Quack 1992, 182) et al.

127. Urk I, 65.17 = Brovarski 2000, 108–109, pl. 75–78a, fig. 23; text fig. 4; Diego Espinel 2011, 60, fig. 8 (no. 120); Edel 2008, I, 50–51, 243 (Abb. 32), Text 59, Taf. 9 = Seyfried 2005, 314–318 (tomb QH 26) et al.
89 Thus, competence of two persons named nj-kA=j-ra with the resembling titles turns out to be ghost and their identity - unreliable.
90 2. The title sHD srjw «inspector of prospectors»128.
128. The main accounts of sources about the title sHD sr(j)w: Jones 2000, 966-967 (3564–3565) («inspector of sr-officials/magistrates»); Hannig 2003, 1189–1190. Data about sHDw sr(j)w in the Sinai inscriptions are tabulated in Tallet 2018, 135.
91 Bearers of the title sHD srjw can be divided into two categories: 1. The expedition members as inspectors of prospectors. 2. Officials of the fiscal service, «inspectors of auditors». The first ones left their inscriptions outside of Egypt, the others, with few exceptions, are known from the monuments from their own tombs in the Memphite region, at Giza and Saqqara. Since it is not easy to identify the functions of officials from the second group, I present their prosopography separately.
92 1. The expeditionary sHDw srjw «inspectors of prospectors» left inscriptions in the Sinai, in Wadi Hammamat and Hatnub.
93 1.1. A collective: sHD srjw 20 «inspector of 20 prospectors». Inscription Hatnub Gr. 3.12129 smsw «elder» instead of sHD srjw (Anthes 1928, 20; Eichler 1993, 43 (39) et al.). This reading appeared because of a mistake in the transcription (cf. Anthes 1928, 20, Anm. 12: he believes that it is the drawing that is incorrect, and not the transcription). Although in the facsimile of the hieratic inscription made by G. Möller it is the sign HD which is obvious and not m, everybody is oriented to the hieroglyphic transcription which results in a mistake. Based on this uncertain reading, M. A. Lebedev devoted half a page of the text to description of activities of the expedition members with the title sms.w which he interpreted as «foremen of (carpenter shops)» (Lebedev 2015, 84, 419) although they were not mentioned in the expedition inscriptions at all.]]] from «year of the 14th occasion (of the counting)» i. e. 27/28th regnal year of king Hr nTrj-xaw (ppj II nfr-kA-ra). The numeral 20 after the title, with the determinative A1 pl. instead of the name, look strange, although it is understandable in the standard name list of the crew.
94 1.2. jHj-n=s (son of?) Hnkw(?): sHD srjw [smntjw] «inspector of prospectors and [guides]». Inscription Wadi Hammamat M 151130. E. Eichler131 identified the author of the inscription jHj-n=s132 with anx-mrj-ra/ jHj-n=s of stela Cairo CG 1483133, however his equating is absolutely arbitrary. anx-mrj-ra/ jHj-n=s was an important nobleman, «overseer of the (department) of all the works of the king» (jmj-rA kAt nbt nt nswt), but jHj-n=s from Wadi Hammamat was only the commander of an expedition crew.
130. Couyat, Montet 1912, 92, pl. 34. Dating: 8th Dynasty.

131. Eichler 1993, 75.

132. To the reading of the name jHj-n=s: Fischer 1996a, 60–61; cf. Scheele-Schweitzer 2014, 260 [451]: JH.y-n=s (?)/N(.j)-sw-JH.y (?) «ein JH.y für sie! (?)/ er gehört dem Ihi (?)».

133. PM III.2 1981, 586; Borchardt 1937, 174–175, Bl. 39. Dating: mrj.n-ra – ppj II.
95 1.3. jd[w?]: [sHD?] srjw «[inspector?] of prospectors». Hieratic ink inscription on gypsum Ayn Soukhna CCIS 250134.
134. Tallet 2012a, I, 227, II, 161–162; 2018, 305; 2020, 6 [Doc. 2], pl. 4–5. Dating: [rnpt-zp] 7 Abd 4 Smw hrw 4 «[year] of the 7th occasion (of the counting), 4th month of the harvest season, 4th day», i. e. 13/14th regnal year of king Dd-kA-ra jzzj.
96 1.4. wAS-k(A=j), Htp-n=j-j, nj-sbk: three persons with a collective title sHD srjw «inspector of prospectors». Inscription Sinai 13135. All the three as holders of this office are not attested in other sources.
135. Weill 1904, 109–116 (11–12); Urk. I, 1932–1933, 56.6-8; Gardiner, Peet, Černý 1952, pl. 7; Baines, Parkinson 1997, 9–27, fig. 1; Tallet 2018, 304. Wadi Maghara. Dating: rnpt m-xt zp 4 Tnwt jHw awt nb «year after the 4th occasion of the counting of all the large and small cattle» i. e. 8/9th regnal year of king Dd-kA-ra jzzj.
97 1.5. Htp: sHD srjw «inspector of prospectors». Inscription Ayn Soukhna CCIS 214136. Judging from the photograph, the usual determinative A1 follows the sign sr, and the small sign xAst is absent at all.]]].
98 1.6. sAbj-km: mSa sHD srjw «expeditionary inspector of prospectors». Inscription Sinai 20137. The ideogram of the soldier with the meaning mSa «army, expedition, campaign» stands in front of the title. The title is written in accordance with the habitual standard for the titles with the element pr-aA, which as a stand-alone title simply means «palace attendant» and in most other cases is put in front of the title as the place of service, for example, as in the title rx nswt pr-aA «king's acquaintance of the palace». Nevertheless, it should be recognized that the ideogram mSa herein means «campaign, march» rather than «army». Similar method was used in the title of jdw: jmj-rA srjw mSa «expeditionary overseer of prospectors»138, which is also attested with the sign mSa «army» in the postposition and determinative A1 in the title of Htp: jmj-(rA) srjw mSa139.
99 1.7. snnw jdw: sHD srjw «inspector of prospectors». Inscription Sinai 19 (CCIS 8)140. With high probability he is identical with [sHD?] srjw jd[w?] (1.3)141.
140. Gardiner, Peet, Černý 1952, pl. 9; Černý 1955, 65; Edel 1983, 158–163, Abb. 1a–b; Tallet 2012a, I, 29, II, 10; 2018, 305. Wadi Maghara. Dating: Dd-kA-ra.

141. Tallet 2018, 108–109.
100 1.8. kAj: sHD srjw smntjw «inspector of prospectors and guides». Inscriptions Wadi Hammamat M 163, M 166, M 167142. The title spellings are following143: (M 163); (M 167, M 166). kAj also held offices of xrp aprw nfrw «captain of a squad of recruits» and jmj-rA 10 wjA «overseer of ten of a boat (i.e. 10 boatmen)» (Wadi Hammamat M 165).
142. Couyat, Montet 1912, 93–94. Dating: 6th Dynasty.

143. There are no photographs of the inscriptions in Couyat & Montet’s publication. I used photographs available on the website ancienegypte.fr/ouadi_hammamat/page2.htm (33.jpg, 41.jpg).
101 2. Interpretation of the title sHD srj(w) in tomb inscriptions depends solely on the context, namely on the accompanying titles clarifying the sphere of activity and other indirect criteria. In most cases the title srjw should be understood as «auditors, fiscal agents, informers», although it could also be the expedition members as shown in the case of the offering basin from tomb G 1111. Prosopography of bearers of the title sHD srj(w) on the monuments from the Memphite region include the following persons:
102 2.1. anx-kAkAj: sHD srj(w) jrj-jxt jz nwd(w) Xkr(w) nswt «inspector of auditors, custodian of property of the division of unguents of the (department of) king’s regalia»144. That functionary was an official of the department of king’s regalia (Xkr(w) nswt) which was divided into two offices (jzwj)145. One of them included a division of nwd(w) unguents146, where anx-kAkAj worked as a petty clerk, performing, in particular, the functions of an «inspector of auditors», which is not surprising given the value of products manufactured at the department establishments.
103 2.2. nj-anx=j-bAstt: sHD srj(w). He was a funerary priest (“ka-servant”, Hm-kA) of the tomb owner, DfAw, who held the office of jmj-rA prwj-HDwj «overseer of the double silver-house»147. That nobleman, who was the head of the entire finance department, appointed his proper servant nj-anx=j-bAstt a clerk at government service; his status was the same as that of anx-kAkAj (2.1).
147. The false door in tomb D 25: Mariette 1889, 254; Petrie, Murray 1952, pl. 14. Saqqara. Dating: nj-wsr-ra.
104 2.3. nfr-jHj: sHD srj(w)148. He was also holding the title rx nswt «king's acquaintance» which was the lowest indicator of nobility. Occupation of nfr-jHj remains uncertain.
105 2.4. nTr-nfr: sHD srj(w)149. Occupation is uncertain.
106 2.5. xww-ra: sHD srjw. He held a unique priestly title Hm-ntr Xnmw mrj Hr «priest of Khnum beloved by Horus»150. Occupation is uncertain.
107 2.6. kA=j-apr151: jmj-rA srjw, sHD n(j) srjw. Other titles: rx nswt «king's acquaintance», sqd n wjA «rower of a boat»152, [...] sr n S[...]? wjA «[...] boat», nst-xnt(j)t «upper throne», wDa-mdw m Hwt-[wrt] «judge in the Hall of Justice»153, wD-mdw n(j) Hrj(w)-wDbw «giver of orders of the (department of) distribution»154, jmj-rA mSa «general», jmj-rA Snwt «overseer of kraal»155. This person combined naval, military and judicial titles in his titulary. According to the naval titles kA=j-apr, I tend to interpret the group srjw on his relief as the expedition members, prospectors.
108 3. Dubia:
109 3.1. jnj, who held the title smsw wxr(j)t, sHD [...] «elder of the dockyard156, inspector [...]»157. The reading sHD sr(w) q[nb]t «inspector of the law [court] sr(w)-officials (?)» indicated by the publisher is incorrect.
110 3.2. bbj held the title sHD nfr(w) srjw(?) «overseer of recruits and prospectors (?)»158. Possibly the sign sr happened to be here by chance instead of the determinative «child» for the word nfrw «recruits». In another graffito of bbj his title is already given in a more standard form: sHD(w) nfrw stp-zA «overseer(s) of recruits of security» jj-mrj and bbj159.
111

TO THE IDENTIFICATION OF sHD srjw «OVERSEER OF PROSPECTORS» jww-nmtj

112 It is possible to single out two persons with the name jww-nmtj, serving in the administration of srjw, among the authors of the inscriptions. I present their data according to prosopography of the bearers of the name jww-nmtj given above:
113 2.3. jww-nmtj. Title: jmj-rA sr(jw) «overseer of prospectors». Inscription Sinai 13 from rnpt m-xt zp 4 Tnwt jHw awt nb «year after the 4th occasion of the counting of all the large and small cattle», i. e. 8/9th regnal year of king Dd-kA-ra jzzj.
114 2.8. jww-nmtj. Title: jmj-rA 10 srjw smntjw «overseer of ten prospectors and guides». Graffito in Gebel Abrak (Eastern desert).
115 Discrepancies in the ranks jmj-rA/sHD «overseer/inspector» are non-essential in this case. Two cases of combination of these ranks in the sphere of srjw corporation can be distinguished: 1. In the titulary of kA=j-apr who mentions the titles jmj-rA srjw and sHD n(j) srjw in his own tomb. 2. According to P. Tallet160, jdw (or snnw jdw) mentioned in inscriptions Sinai 19 (CCIS 8), Sinai 21 (CCIS 9), Sinai 22 (CCIS 7)161 and CCIS 250 is one and the same person, a member of the expedition to the Sinai under the reign of king Dd-kA-ra jzzj. Therefore, he held the offices of sHD srjw (mentioned in CCIS 8 and CCIS 250) and jmj-rA srjw (mentioned in CCIS 9) at the same time.
160. Tallet 2018, 108–109.

161. Tallet 2012a, I, 28, II, 9; 2018, 305. Wadi Maghara.
116 There is nothing worth saying about jww-nmtj of the Abrak inscription; besides, it is difficult to date it exactly. As for jww-nmtj (2.3) of inscription Sinai 13, nothing prevents this identification. Almost certainly, this official is identical with the owner of the offering basin from tomb G 1111, this is why the tomb should also be dated to the reign of Dd-kA-ra jzzj.
117 Since long, inscription Sinai 13 has attracted great attention from many researchers owing to its unusual content162. The list of members of the expedition to the turquoise mines presented therein includes the preamble which is often considered as the first evidence on the divine oracle in Egypt. According to this text, the expedition to the Sinai was inspired by finding the god's assignment on the precious stone in the broad court of the temple nxn-ra «Stronghold of the Sun», the Sun temple of king wsr-kA=f. The offering basin from tomb G 1111 may prove to be the first monument belonging to a member of that expedition - overseer and inspector of prospectors-sr(jw) jww-nmtj.
162. Literature review: Baines, Parkinson 1997, 10–11; see also Kammerzell 2001, 153–164.
118

List of abbreviations

PM III.1 1974 – Porter, B., Moss, R.B. Topographical Bibliography of Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphic Texts, Reliefs and Paintings. Vol. III. Memphis. 2nd ed. Pt. 1. Abû Rawâsh to Abûṣîr. Oxford.

PM III.2 1981 – Porter, B., Moss, R.B. Topographical Bibliography of Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphic Texts, Reliefs and Paintings. Vol. III. Memphis. 2nd ed. Pt. 2. Ṣaqqâra to Dahshûr. Oxford.

PM V 1937 – Porter B., Moss R.B. Topographical Bibliography of Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphic Texts, Reliefs and Paintings. Vol. V. Upper Egypt: Sites. Oxford.

PM VIII.1 1999 – Malek, J., Magee, D. Miles, E. (eds.), Topographical Bibliography of Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphic Texts, Statues, Reliefs and Paintings. Volume VIII: Objects of Provenance Not Known. Part I: Royal Statues, Private Statues (Predynastic to Dynasty XVII), Oxford.

PM VIII.3 2007 – Malek, J., Fleming, E., Hobby, A., Magee, D. (eds.), Topographical Bibliography of Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphic Texts, Statues, Reliefs and Paintings. Volume VIII: Objects of Provenance Not Known. Part 3: Stelae (Early Dynastic Period to Dynasty XVII). Oxford.

Urk. I 1932-1933 – Sethe, K. (ed.), Urkunden des Alten Reiches. 2. Aufl. (Urkunden des ägyptischen Altertums, Erste Abteilung, 1). Leipzig, 1932-1933.

Wb. – Erman, A., Grapow, H. (Hrsg.), Wörterbuch der ägyptischen Sprache. Bd. I–V. 4. Aufl. Berlin, 1982.

Библиография

1. Abdel-Raziq, A. 2017: An unpublished lintel of Ahmose-Nebpehtyre from El-Atâwla. Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt 53, 47–55.

2. Abu Bakr, A.M., Osing, J. 1973: Ächtungstexte aus dem Alten Reich. Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Abteilung Kairo 29, 97–133.

3. Adams, M.D. 2010: The stela of Nakht, son of Nemty: contextualizing object and individual in the funerary landscape at Abydos. In: Z. Hawass, J. Houser Wegner (eds.), Millions of jubilees: studies in honor of David P. Silverman. Vol. I. (Supplément aux Annales du Service des Antiquités de l'Egypte, 39). Le Caire, 1–25.

4. Andreu, G. 1997: La fausse-porte de Nykarê, Cleveland Museum of Art 64.91. In: C. Berger, B. Mathieu (éd.), Études sur l’Ancien Empire et la nécropole de Saqqâra dédiées à Jean-Philippe Lauer. T. I. (Orientalia Monspeliensia, 9). Montpellier, 21–30.

5. Anthes, R. 1928: Die Felseninschriften von Hatnub: nach den Aufnahmen Georg Möllers. (Untersuchungen zur Geschichte und Altertumskunde Aegyptens, 9). Leipzig.

6. Assmann, J. 1999: Ägyptische Hymnen und Gebete: übersetzt, kommentiert und eingeleitet. 2. Aufl. Freiburg (Schweiz)–Göttingen.

7. Bailleul-LeSuer, R.F. 2016: The Exploitation of Live Avian Resources in Pharaonic Egypt: a Socio-Economic Study. PhD Diss. University of Chicago. URL: oi.uchicago.edu/sites/oi.uchicago.edu/files/uploads/shared/docs/Research_Archives/Dissertations/Rozenn%20Dissertation%20052516.pdf; дата обращения: 14.04.2021.

8. Baines, J., Parkinson, R.B. 1997: An Old Kingdom record of an oracle? Sinai inscription 13. In: J. van Dijk (ed.), Essays on Ancient Egypt in Honour of Herman te Velde. (Egyptological Memoirs, 1). Groningen, 9–27.

9. Barbotin, Chr. (ed.) 1995: Collection égyptienne: Musée Granet, Aix-en-Provence. Aix-en-Provence.

10. Bárta, M. 2009: Abusir XIII: Abusir South 2. Tomb Complex of the Vizier Qar, his Sons Qar Junior and Senedjemib, and Iykai. Prague.

11. Barta, W. 1963: Die altägyptische Opferliste von der Frühzeit bis zur griechisch-römischen Epoche. (Münchner Ägyptologische Studien, 3). Berlin.

12. Barta, W. 1968: Aufbau und Bedeutung der altägyptischen Opferformel. (Ägyptologische Forschungen, 24). Glückstadt.

13. Baud, M. 1999: Famille royale et pouvoir sous l’Ancien Empire égyptien. T. I–II. Le Caire.

14. Berlev, O.D. 1969: [‘Falcon in boat’, a hieroglyph and a god]. Vestnik drevney istorii [Journal of Ancient History] 1, 3–30.

15. Берлев, О.Д. «Сокол, плывущий в ладье»: иероглиф и бог. ВДИ 1, 3–30.

16. Berman, L.M., Bohač, J.K. 1999: Catalogue of Egyptian art: the Cleveland Museum of Art. New York.

17. Bland, L., Malek, J. 1977: Nemtywer, the beholder of the beauty of his lord (Ashmolean Mus. 1885.504). Orientalia Lovaniensia Periodica 8, 119–123.http://proxy.library.spbu.ru:3829/ReferenceExport.aspx?id=19979

18. Boeser, P.A.A. 1909: Die Denkmäler der Zeit zwischen dem Alten und Mittleren Reich und des Mittleren Reiches. 1. Abteilung: Stelen. (Beschreibung der aegyptischen Sammlungen, 2.1). Haag.

19. Bogdanov, I.V. 2014: [The administrative hierarchy in the Old Kingdom Egypt]. Shіdnij svіt [The World of the Orient] 4, 5–18.

20. Богданов, И.В. Должностная иерархия в Египте эпохи Древнего царства. Східний світ 4, 5–18.

21. Bogdanov, I.V. 2017a: [Crowning and economy: aspects of bureaucratic consciousness in the Old Kingdom Egypt]. In: I.F. Popova, I.V. Bogdanov (eds.), Strany i narody Vostoka. Vyp. 37. Gosudarstvo na Vostoke [Countries and Peoples of the East. Issue. 37. The State in the East]. Moscow, 5–120.

22. Богданов, И.В. Коронация и экономика: аспекты бюрократического сознания в Египте эпохи Древнего царства. В сб.: И.Ф. Попова, И.В. Богданов (ред.), Страны и народы Востока. Вып. 37. Государство на Востоке. М., 5–120.

23. Bogdanov, I.V. 2017b: Relief of wnwj (tomb G 2465): from Giza for sale (Tab. VIII–IX). Orientalia 86 (2), 164–180.

24. Bogdanov, I.V. 2018: New relief fragments from the tomb of the seafarer jnj. Chronique d’Égypte 93 (186), 227–247.

25. Bogdanov, I.V. 2019: The Old Kingdom evidence on the toponym xntj-S “Lebanon”. Ägypten und Levante 29, 125–148.

26. Bogdanov, I.V., Bolshakov, А.О. 2004: [The Old Kingdom relief of xw(j)-w(j)-nfr from the Hermitage collection and the tomb G 2098]. Vestnik drevney istorii [Journal of Ancient History] 2, 12–32.

27. Богданов, И.В., Большаков, А.О. Староегипетский рельеф xw(j)-w(j)-nfr в собрании Эрмитажа и гробница G 2098. ВДИ 2, 12–32.

28. Bolshakov, A.O. 2005: Studies on Old Kingdom Reliefs and Sculpture in the Hermitage. (Ägyptologische Abhandlungen, 67). Wiesbaden.

29. Borchardt, L. 1911: Statuen und Statuetten von Königen und Privatleuten. Teil I. Text und Tafeln zu Nr. 1–380. (CG, no. 1–1294). Berlin.

30. Borchardt, L. 1937: Denkmäler des Alten Reiches (ausser den Statuen) im Museum von Kairo. Teil I. Text und Tafeln zu Nr. 1295–1541. (CG, NO. 1295–1808). BERLIN.

31. Bosticco, S. 1959: Museo Archeologico di Firenze. Vol. I. Le stele egiziane dall'Antico al Nuovo Regno. Roma.

32. Brovarski, Ed. 2000: Giza Mastabas 7. The Senedjemib Complex. Pt. 1. The Mastabas of Senedjemib Inti (G 2370), Khnumenti (G 2374), and Senedjemib Mehi (G 2378). Boston.

33. Brovarski, Ed. 2016: Some Monuments of the Old Kingdom in the Field Museum of Natural History – Chicago. (Bibliothèque d'étude, 166). Le Caire.

34. Brovarski, Ed. 2018: Naga ed-Dêr in the First Intermediate Period. Atlanta.

35. Bruyn, P. de 1958: Falcon graffiti in the Eastern desert. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 44, 97–98.

36. Budge, E.A.W. 1912: Hieroglyphic Texts from Egyptian Stelae, &c., in the British Museum. Pt. II. London.

37. Budge, E.A.W. 1913: Hieroglyphic Texts from Egyptian Stelae, &c., in the British Museum. Pt. IV. London.

38. Cannuyer, Chr. 2010: La girafe dans l’Égypte ancienne et le verbe : étude de lexicographie et de symbolique animalière. (Acta Orientalia Belgica, Subsidia IV). Bruxelles.

39. Černý, J. 1955: The Inscriptions of Sinai from Manuscripts of Alan H. Gardiner and T. Eric Peet. Part II. Translations and Commentary. (EES, 45). London.

40. Clère, J.J. 1935-1938: Le fonctionnement grammatical de l'expression pri xrw en ancien égyptien. In: Mélanges Maspero I: Orient ancien, fasc. 2. (MIFAO, 66). Le Caire, 753–797.

41. Couyat, J., Montet, P. 1912: Les inscriptions hiéroglyphiques et hiératiques du Ouâdi Hammâmât. (MIFAO, 34). Le Caire.

42. Daoud, Kh.A. 2005: Corpus of Inscriptions of the Herakleopolitan Period from the Memphite Necropolis: Translation, Commentary, and Analyses. (BAR International Series, 1459). Oxford.

43. Diego Espinel, A. 2006: Etnicidad y territorio en el Egipto del Reino Antiguo. Barcelona.

44. Diego Espinel, A. 2011: Blocks from the Unas causeway recorded in Černý’s notebooks at the Griffith Institute, Oxford. In: N. Strudwick, H. Strudwick (eds.), Old Kingdom, New Perspectives: Egyptian Art and Archaeology 2750–2150 BC. Oxford, 50–70.

45. Diego Espinel, A. 2014: Surveyors, guides and other officials in the Egyptian and Nubian deserts: epigraphic and historical remarks on some Old Kingdom graffiti. Revue d’égyptologie 65, 29–48.

46. Edel, E. 1955–1964: Altägyptische Grammatik I–II. Roma.

47. Edel, E. 1983: Beiträge zu den ägyptischen Sinaiinschriften. Göttingen, 158–185.

48. Edel, E. 2008: Die Felsgräbernekropole der Qubbet el Hawa bei Assuan. I. Abteilung. Bd. I–III. Die Architektur, Darstellung, Texte, archäologischer Befund und Funde der Gräber QH 24 – QH 209. Paderborn.

49. Eichler, E. 1993: Untersuchungen zum Expeditionswesen des ägyptischen Alten Reiches. Wiesbaden.

50. El-Tonssy, M.A., Yossef, M. 2014: Two unpublished false doors from Saqqara. Studien zur Altägyptischen Kultur 43, 439–455.

51. Épron, L., Daumas, F., Goyon, G. 1939: Le tombeau de Tî: dessins et aquarelles. (MIFAO, 65). Le Caire.

52. Fakhry, A. 1961: The Monuments of Sneferu at Dahshur. Vol. II. The Valley Temple. Pt. 2. The Finds. Cairo.

53. Fischer, H.G. 1960: Old Kingdom inscriptions in the Yale Gallery. Mitteilungen des Instituts für Orientforschung 7 (3), 299–315.

54. Fischer, H.G. 1964: Inscriptions from the Coptite Nome. Dynasties VI–XI. Roma

55. Fischer, H.G. 1968: Dendera in the Third Millennium BC Down to the Theban Domination of Upper Egypt. Locust Valley (NY).

56. Fischer, H.G. 1974: The mark of a second hand on ancient Egyptian antiquities. Metropolitan Museum Journal 9, 5–34.

57. Fischer, H.G. 1976: (Rev.:) B. Porter, R.B. Moss, assisted by E.W. Burney. Topographical Bibliography of Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphic Texts, Reliefs and Paintings. Vol. III. Memphis. Pt. I: Abû Rawâsh to Abûṣîr. 2nd ed., rev. and aug. by Jaromír Málek. Oxford, 1974. Bibliotheca Orientalis 33, 21–24.

58. Fischer, H.G. 1985: More about the smntjw. Göttinger Miszellen 84, 25–32.

59. Fischer, H.G. 1987–1988: A parental link between two Thinite stelae of the Heracleopolitan period. Bulletin of the Egyptological Seminar of New York 9, 15–23.

60. Fischer, H.G. 1996a: Egyptian Studies III. Varia Nova. New York.

61. Fischer, H.G. 1996b: The Tomb of Ip at El Saff. New York.

62. Fischer, H.G. 1997: Quelques particuliers enterrés à Saqqâra. In: C. Berger, B. Mathieu (éd.), Études sur l’Ancien Empire et la nécropole de Saqqâra dédiées à Jean-Philippe Lauer. T. I. (Orientalia Monspeliensia, 9). Montpellier, 177–189.

63. Florès, J. 2015: Les céréales : analyse d'une gestion au protodynastique et sous l’Ancien Empire. (Studien zur Altägyptischen Kultur, Beihefte 17). Hamburg.

64. Franke, D. 1984: Personendaten aus dem Mittleren Reich (20.–16. Jahrhundert v. Chr.): Dossiers 1–796. (Ägyptologische Abhandlungen, 41). Wiesbaden.

65. Gardiner, A.H. 1957: Hymns to Sobk in a Ramesseum papyrus. Revue d’égyptologie 11, 43–56.

66. Gardiner, A.H., Peet, T.E., Černý, J. 1952: The Inscriptions of Sinai. Pt. I. Introduction and Plates. 2nd ed. (EES, 36). London.

67. Gauthier-Laurent, M. 1931: Quelques objets égyptiens du Musée de Langres. Bulletin de l’Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale 30, 107–125.

68. Gauthier-Laurent, M. 1933: Une stèle du Moyen-Empire. Revue d’égyptologie 1, 75–80.

69. Generalverwaltung (ed.) 1913: Ägyptische Inschriften aus den Königlichen Museen zu Berlin. Bd. I. Leipzig.

70. Goedicke, H. 1967: Königliche Dokumente aus dem Alten Reich. (Ägyptologische Abhandlungen, 14). Wiesbaden.

71. Goelet, O. Jr. 1982: Two Aspects of the Royal Palace in the Egyptian Old Kingdom. PhD Thesis. Columbia University.

72. Graefe, E. 1980: Studien zu den Göttern und Kulten im 12. und 10. oberägyptischen Gau (insbesondere in der Spät- und griechisch-römischen Zeit). Freiburg.

73. Gundacker, R. 2010: Eine besondere Form des Substantivalsatzes: mit besonderer Rücksicht auf ihre dialektale und diachrone Bedeutung. Lingua Aegyptia 18, 47–117.

74. Gundacker, R. 2013: Die Eigennamen der Könige der IV. Dynastie. Ihre Struktur und Bedeutung gemäß ägyptischen und griechischen Graphien. Lingua Aegyptia 21, 35–130.

75. Gundacker, R. 2014: Die Namen #Substantiv – cDm=f# im Alten Reich. Über die onomasiologische Vielfalt hinter der graphischen Einheit. Lingua Aegyptia 22, 61–144.

76. Hamza Awad, Kh.A. 2006: Untersuchungen zu den Beamtentiteln des Nj-kA-Ra anhand der Scheintür Nr. 64.91 im Cleveland Museum of Art. In: G. Moers, H. Behlmer, K. Demuß, K. Widmaier (eds.), jn.t Dr.w: Festschrift für Friedrich Junge. Bd. I. Göttingen, 73–87.

77. Hannig, R. 2003: Ägyptisches Wörterbuch I. Altes Reich und Erste Zwischenzeit. (Hannig-Lexica, 4). Mainz am Rhein.

78. Hannig, R. 2006: Ägyptisches Wörterbuch II. Mittleres Reich und Zweite Zwischenzeit. (Hannig-Lexica, 5). Mainz am Rhein.

79. Hassan, S. 1936: Excavations at Gîza. Vol. II. 1930–1931. Cairo.

80. Hayes, W.C. 1951a: Inscriptions from the Palace of Amenhotep III. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 10 (1), 35–56.

81. Hayes, W.C. 1951b: Inscriptions from the Palace of Amenhotep III. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 10 (2), 82–112.

82. Hintze, F., Reineke, W.F. 1989: Felsinschriften aus dem sudanesischen Nubien. Bd. I–II. (Publikation der Nubien-Expedition 1961–1963, 1). Berlin.

83. Hodjash, S., Berlev, O. 1982: The Egyptian Reliefs and Stelae in the Pushkin Museum of Fine Arts, Moscow. Leningrad.

84. Ilin-Tomich, A. 2017: From Workshop to Sanctuary: the Production of Late Middle Kingdom Memorial Stelae. (Middle Kingdom Studies, 6). London.

85. James, T.G.H. 1974: Corpus of Hieroglyphic Inscriptions in the Brooklyn Museum. Vol. I. From Dynasty I to the End of Dynasty XVIII. Brooklyn (NY).

86. Jones, D. 2000: An Index of Ancient Egyptian Titles, Epithets and Phrases of the Old Kingdom. Vol. I–II. Oxford.

87. Junker, H. 1943: Gîza VI. Die Maṣṭaba des nfr (Nefer), ḳdfjj (Kedfi), kAHjf (Kahjef) und die westlich anschließenden Grabanlagen. Wien–Leipzig.

88. Junker, H. 1947: Gîza VIII. Der Ostabschnitt des Westfriedhofs. 2. Teil. Wien.

89. Kaiser, W., Dreyer, G., Gempeler, R., Grossmann, P., Haeny, G., Jaritz, H., Junge, Fr. 1976: Stadt und Tempel von Elephantine. 6. Grabungsbericht. Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Abteilung Kairo 32, 67–112.

90. Kamal El-din, N. 2009: Die Scheintür des Odw. Bulletin of the Egyptian Museum 6, 19–26.

91. Kammerzell, F. 2001: “... within the altar of the sun”: an unidentified hieroglyph and the construction of the sun temple Nxn-Raw. In: O. Goldwasser, D. Sweeney (eds.), Structuring Egyptian Syntax: a Tribute to Sarah Israelit-Groll. (Lingua Aegyptia, 9). Göttingen, 153–164.

92. Kanawati, N. 2013: The mastaba of Kaihai: where the cemeteries of Weserkaf and Teti meet. Études et Travaux 26 (1), 347–362.

93. Kaplony, P. 1963: Die Inschriften der ägyptischen Frühzeit. Vol. II. (Ägyptologische Abhandlungen, 8). Wiesbaden.

94. Kaplony, P. 1981: Die Rollsiegel des Alten Reiches. Vol. II A–B. (Monumenta Aegyptiaca, 3A–3B). Bruxelles.

95. Kitchen, K.A. 1990: Catálogo da Coleçao do Egito Antigo existente no Museu National, Rio de Janeiro / Catalogue of the Egyptian Collection in the National Museum, Rio de Janeiro. Preparado com a colaboraçao da Maria da Conceiçao Beltrao. Vol. I. Texto / Text. Vol. II. Illustraçoes / Plates. Warminster.

96. Kormysheva, E., Malykh, S., Lebedev, M., Vetokhov, S. 2015: Giza. Eastern Necropolis III. Tombs of Tjenty II, Khufuhotep, and Anonymous Tombs GE 17, GE 18, GE 47, GE 48, and GE 49. Moscow.

97. Koura, B. 2003: Oils and fats manufacturing institutions: the names of workshops and titles of workers and officials. In: Chr. Leblanc (éd.), Parfums, onguents et cosmétiques dans l’Égypte ancienne : actes des rencontres pluridisciplinaires tenues au Conseil national de la culture, Le Caire 27–29 avril 2002. (Memnonia, Cahier supplémentaire, 1). Le Caire, 67–79.

98. Kuhlmann, K.-P. 2005: Der „Wasserberg des Djedefre” (Chufu 01/1): ein Lagerplatz mit Expeditionsinschriften der 4. Dynastie im Raum der Oase Dachla. Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Abteilung Kairo 61, 243–289.

99. Labrousse, A., Lauer, J.-Ph., Leclant, J. 1977: Mission archéologique de Saqqara II. Le temple haut du complexe funéraire du roi Ounas. (Bibliothèque d’étude, 73). Le Caire.

100. Lange, H.O., Schäfer, H. 1902a: Grab- und Denksteine des Mittleren Reichs im Museum von Kairo. Teil I. Text zu No. 20001–20399. (CG, no. 20001–20780). Berlin.

101. Lange, H.O., Schäfer, H. 1902b: Grab- und Denksteine des Mittleren Reichs im Museum von Kairo. Teil IV. Tafeln. (CG, no. 20001–20780). Berlin.

102. Lange, H.O., Schäfer, H. 1908: Grab- und Denksteine des Mittleren Reichs im Museum von Kairo. Teil II. Text zu No. 20400–20780. (CG, no. 20001–20780). Berlin.

103. Lapp, G. 1986: Die Opferformel des Alten Reiches: unter Berücksichtigung einiger späterer Formen. (Sonderschrift, Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Abteilung Kairo 21). Mainz.

104. Lebedev, M.A. 2015: Slugi faraona vdali ot Nila: razvitie kontaktov drevneegipetskoy tsivilizatsii s okruzhayushhimi oblastyami v epokhu Drevnego i Srednego tsarstv [Servants of the pharaoh far from the Nile: the development of contacts of the ancient Egyptian civilization with the surrounding areas during the Old and Middle Kingdom]. Saint Petersburg.

105. Лебедев, М.А. Слуги фараона вдали от Нила: развитие контактов древнеегипетской цивилизации с окружающими областями в эпоху Древнего и Среднего царств. СПб.

106. Legros, R. 2013: Un cas de fabrication collective à Saqqâra? La table d’offrandes de Setjou. Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt 49, 153–166.

107. Lehmann, K. 1995: Die Mastaba G 2009 auf dem Westfriedhof von Giza. Magisterarbeit, Universität Heidelberg. URL: http://www.gizapyramids.org/static/pdf%20library/lehmann_mastaba.pdf; дата обращения: 9.04.2021.

108. Leitz, Chr. (Hrsg.) 2002: Lexikon der ägyptischen Götter und Götterbezeichnungen. Bd. 4. (Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta, 113). Leuven–Paris–Dudley.

109. Lepsius, C.R. 1849–1859: Denkmaeler aus Aegypten und Aethiopien II. Berlin.

110. Luft, U. 1984: dj.j rx.k. In: F. Junge (Hrsg.), Studien zu Sprache und Religion Ägyptens: zu Ehren von Wolfhart Westendorf, überreicht von seinen Freunden and Schülern. Bd. I. Sprache. Göttingen, 103–111.

111. Mariette, A. 1889: Les mastabas de l’Ancien Empire. Paris.

112. Martin-Pardey, E. 1994: Richten im Alten Reich und die sr-Beamten. In: B.M. Bryan, D. Lorton (eds.), Essays in Egyptology in honor of Hans Goedicke. San Antonio, 157–167.

113. Meeks, D. 1998: Année lexicographique : Égypte ancienne. T. I. 1977. T. II. 1978. 2ème éd. Paris.

114. Moeller, N., Marouard, G. 2020: Excavations on the Old Kingdom settlement at Tell Edfu. The Oriental Institute News & Notes 244, 10–17.

115. Moreno García, J.C. 1997: Études sur l’administration, le pouvoir et l’idéologie en Égypte, de l’Ancien au Moyen Empire. (Ægyptiaca Leodiensia, 4). Liège.

116. Moret, A. 1909: Catalogue du Musée Guimet: galerie égyptienne, stèles, bas-reliefs, monuments divers. (Annales du Musée Guimet, 32). Paris.

117. Mostafa, M.F. 2014: The Mastaba of SmAj at Nag’ Kom el-Koffar, Qift I: Autobiographies and Related Scenes and Texts. Cairo.

118. Moussa, A. 1972: Lintels and lower parts of a leaf of a wooden relief-sculptured door of the Old Kingdom from Saqqara. Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Abteilung Kairo 28, 289–291.

119. Müller, M., Schenkel W., Gomaà F. 2004: Scharuna I: der Grabungsplatz, die Nekropole, Gräber aus der Alten-Reichs-Nekropole. Bd. I–II. Mainz.

120. Nilsson, M., Faraman, A., Said, A. 2018: Some rock inscriptions from Gebel el-Silsila. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 104 (1), 71–79.

121. Nuzzolo, M. 2018: The Fifth Dynasty Sun Temples: Kingship, Architecture and Religion in Third Millennium BC Egypt. Prague.

122. Osing, J. 1976a: Ächtungstexte aus dem Alten Reich (II). Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Abteilung Kairo 32, 133–185.

123. Osing, J. 1976b: Die Nominalbildung des Ägyptischen. Bd. I–II. (Sonderschrift, Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Abteilung Kairo 3). Mainz.

124. Osing, J. 2004: Les graffiti de l’Ancien et du Moyen Empire au Gebel el-Silsila. In: A. Gasse, V. Rondot (eds.), Séhel entre Égypte et Nubie: inscriptions rupestres et graffiti de l’époque pharaonique, actes du colloque international, 31 mai – 1 juin 2002, Université Paul Valéry, Montpellier. (Orientalia monspeliensia, 14). Montpellier, 3–6.

125. Perdu, O. 2016: Un témoignage inédit sur un grand dignitaire saïte: le précepteur Horirâa (P. VI–X). Revue d’égyptologie 67, 77–140.

126. Petrie, H.F., Murray, M.A. 1952: Seven Memphite Tomb Chapels. (British School of Archaeology in Egypt and Egyptian Research Account, 65). London.

127. Piacentini, P. 2002a: Encore sur les scribes des offrandes divines. In: R. Pirelli (éd.), Egyptological essays on state and society. (Serie egittologica, 2). Napoli, 95–109.

128. Piacentini, P. 2002b: Les scribes dans la société égyptienne de l’Ancien Empire. Vol. I. Les premières dynasties. Les nécropoles memphites. (Études et Mémoires d’Égyptologie, 5). Paris.

129. Quack, J.F. 1992: Studien zur Lehre für Merikare. (Göttinger Orientforschungen, 4. Reihe: Ägypten, 23). Wiesbaden.

130. Ranke, H. 1935: Die ägyptischen Personennamen. Bd. I. Verzeichnis der Namen. Glückstadt.

131. Ranke, H. 1952: Die ägyptischen Personennamen. Bd. II. Einleitung. Form und Inhalt der Namen. Geschichte der Namen. Vergleiche mit andren Namen. Nachträge und Zusätze zu Bd. I. Umschreibungslisten. Glückstadt–Hamburg–New York.

132. Roth, A.M. 1995: Giza Mastabas. Vol. VI. A Cemetery of Palace Attendants Including G 2084–2099, G 2230+2231, and G 2240. Boston.

133. Scheele-Schweitzer, K. 2014: Die Personennamen des Alten Reiches. Altägyptische Onomastik unter lexikographischen und sozio-kulturellen Aspekten. Wiesbaden.

134. Schenkel, W. 1965: Memphis, Herakleopolis, Theben. Die epigraphischen Zeugnisse der 7.-11. Dynastie Ägyptens. (Ägyptologische Abhandlungen, 12). Wiesbaden.

135. Schindler von Wallenstern, E. 2011: Die Reiher im Alten Ägypten. Ornithologische Betrachtungen und religionsgeschichtliche Bedeutung. Diss. Tübingen. URL: https://publikationen.uni-tuebingen.de/xmlui/handle/10900/46883; дата обращения: 14.04.2021.

136. Schlögl, H. (Hrsg.) 1978: Geschenk des Nils. Aegyptische Kunstwerke aus Schweizer Besitz: eine Ausstellung des Ägyptologischen Seminars der Universität Basel in Zusamenarbeit mit dem Schweizerischen Bankverein. Basel.

137. Schulz, R. 1992: Die Entwicklung und Bedeutung des kuboiden Statuentypus: eine Untersuchung zu den sogenannten “Würfelhockern”. Bd. I–II. (Hildesheimer Ägyptologische Beiträge, 33–34). Hildesheim.

138. Seidlmayer, St.J. 2005: Bemerkungen zu den Felsinschriften des Alten Reiches auf Elephantine. In: St.J. Seidlmayer (Hrsg.), Texte und Denkmäler des ägyptischen Alten Reiches. (Thesaurus linguae aegyptiae, 3). Berlin, 287–308.

139. Seyfried, K.-J. 2005: Qubbet el Hawa: Stand und Perspektiven der Bearbeitung. In: St.J. Seidlmayer (Hrsg.), Texte und Denkmäler des ägyptischen Alten Reiches. (Thesaurus linguae aegyptiae, 3). Berlin, 309–334.

140. Simpson, W.K. 1974: The Terrace of the Great God at Abydos: the Offering Chapels of Dynasties 12 and 13. (Publications of the Pennsylvania-Yale expedition to Egypt, 5). New Haven.

141. Smith, W.St. 1946: A History of Egyptian Sculpture and Painting in the Old Kingdom. London.

142. Sperveslage, G. 2010: Das Kongruenzverhalten von Adjektiven im Altägyptischen. Lingua Aegyptia 18, 217–251.

143. Stefanović, D. 2011: The Hm.t n tA-wr bbi. Göttinger Miszellen. Beiträge zur ägyptologischen Diskussion 231, 97–100.

144. Steindorff, G. 1913: Das Grab des Ti. (Veröffentlichungen der Ernst von Sieglin Expedition in Ägypten, 2). Leipzig.

145. Strudwick, N.С. 1985: The Administration of Egypt in the Old Kingdom. The Highest Titles and their Holders. London.

146. Strudwick, N.C. 2005: Texts from the Pyramid Age. (WAW, 16). Atlanta.

147. Tallet, P. 2012a: La zone minière pharaonique du Sud-Sinaï. I: Catalogue complémentaire des inscriptions du Sinaï. T. I–II. (MIFAO, 130). Le Caire.

148. Tallet, P. 2012b: New inscriptions from Ayn Soukhna: 2002–2009. In: P. Tallet, El-S. Mahfouz (eds.), The Red Sea in Pharaonic Times: Recent Discoveries along the Red Sea Coast. Proceedings of the Colloquium held in Cairo. Ayn Soukhna 11th–12th January 2009. (Bibliothèque d'étude, 155). Le Caire, 105–115.

149. Tallet, P. 2018: La zone minière pharaonique du Sud-Sinaï. III: Les expéditions égyptiennes dans la zone minière du Sud-Sinaï du prédynastique à la fin de la XXe dynastie. (MIFAO, 138). Le Caire.

150. Tallet, P. 2020: Le matériel inscrit d’Ayn Soukhna (2002–2016): doc. 1 à 71. In: G. Castel, P. Tallet (éd.), Ayn Soukhna IV: le matériel des galeries-magasins. (Fouilles de l’IFAO, 82). Le Caire, 1–119.

151. Thirion, M. 1985: Notes d’onomastique, contribution à une révision de Ranke PN [4ème série]. Revue d’égyptologie 36, 125–143.

152. Thirion, M. 2003: Notes d'onomastique, contribution à une révision du Ranke PN [12ème série]. Revue d’égyptologie 54, 177–190.

153. Vernus, P. 1971: Noms propres juxtaposés au Moyen Empire. Revue d’égyptologie 23, 193–199.

154. Vernus, P. 1980: Études de philologie et de linguistique. Revue d’égyptologie 32, 117–134.

155. Vernus, P. 1986: Le surnom au Moyen Empire : répertoire, procédés d'expression et structures de la double identité du début de la XIIe dynastie à la fin de la XVIIe dynastie. (Studia Pohl, 13). Rome.

156. Vernus, P. 1987: Edfou, du début de la XIIe dynastie au début de la XVIIIe dynastie, études philologiques, sociologiques et historiques d’un corpus documentaire de l’Égypte pharaonique. Thèse de doctorat d’État. Paris.

157. Wassell, B. 1991: Ancient Egyptian Fauna: A Lexicographical Study. Vol. I–II. PhD Diss. University of Durham. URL: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/1152/; дата обращения: 14.04.2021.

158. Weeks, K.R. 1994: Mastabas of Cemetery G 6000: including G 6010 (Neferbauptah); G 6020 (Iymery); G 6030 (Ity); G 6040 (Shepseskafankh). (Giza Mastabas, 5). Boston.

159. Weill, R. 1904: Recueil des inscriptions égyptiennes du Sinaï : bibliographie, texte, traduction et commentaire, précédé de la géographie, de l’histoire et de la bibliographie des établissements égyptiens de la péninsule. Paris.

160. Weill, R. 1912: Les décrets royaux de l’Ancien Empire égyptien : étude sur les décrets royaux trouvés à Koptos au cours des travaux de la Société française des fouilles archéologiques (campagnes de 1910 et 1911) et sur les documents similaires d’autres provenances. Paris.

161. Wilson, J.A. 1947: The artist of the Egyptian Old Kingdom. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 6 (4), 231–249.

162. Woodward, S.R., Kanawati, N. 1995: The Tombs of el-Hagarsa, 3. (Australian Centre for Egyptology: Reports, 7). Sydney.

163. Yoyotte, J. 1975: Les « sementiou » et l’exploitation des régions minières à l’ancien Empire. Communication du 5 juin 1974. Bulletin de la Société Française d’Égyptologie 73, 44–55.

164. Ziegler, Chr. 1990: Catalogue des stèles, peintures et reliefs égyptiens de l’Ancien Empire et de la Première Période Intermédiaire vers 2686–2040 avant J.-C. Paris.

Комментарии

Сообщения не найдены

Написать отзыв
Перевести