- PII
- S0132-16250000616-3-1
- DOI
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 339 / Sotsialogicheski issledovania. Issue 7
- Pages
- 37-42
- Abstract
- Societal dissatisfaction with structuralist approaches have become the reason for yet another crisis of modern sociology. Traditional sociology ignored the person who is able to make individual decisions and make informed choices, and in traditional economic theory, this person " hung in an airless space” in the absence of supporting social structures. Sociologists have become interested in what is happening in neoinstitutional economic theory, and, moreover, intensively borrow its conceptual apparatus. Attempts to resolve the crisis are demonstrated today by theorists of the activist-activity direction (for example, M. Archer, E. Giddens, P. Shtompka, etc.), and in the field of Economics – neoinstitutionalists. The article represents the activist-activity paradigm that we share (in Russia, its supporters are S. A. Kravchenko, V. A. Yadov, and others), the main principle which goes back to the formula of Karl Marx that people are born under the same conditions, their practical activities change them, changing themselves.
- Keywords
- activist-activity paradigm, institutional changes, habitus, interaction practices
- Date of publication
- 05.07.2012
- Number of purchasers
- 1
- Views
- 607
RAS History & PhilologyRusskaya rech
- ISSN (Print) 0131-6117
- ISSN (Online)3034-5928
ACTIVIST-ACTIVITY METHODOLOGY IN MODELING THE PROCESS OF INSTITUTIONAL CHANGES (EXPERIENCE IN ANALYZING FOREIGN CONCEPTS)
Индексирование
Scopus
Crossref
Higher Attestation Commission
At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
Scientific Electronic Library