Везде
CULTURAL-SPECIFIC AND INDIVIDUAL IN THE LIFE STORIES OF MEN AND WOMEN (BASED ON AUTOBIOGRAPHIES)
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
CULTURAL-SPECIFIC AND INDIVIDUAL IN THE LIFE STORIES OF MEN AND WOMEN (BASED ON AUTOBIOGRAPHIES)
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000525-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Nadezhda Radina 
Abstract
Models of men’s and women’s life stories have been reconstructed on the basis of transformed into categorical matrixes autobiographical texts. The hypothesis that gender-specific male and female autobiographies are not reduced to the specifics of male and female speech but reflect a subjective processing of gender socialization norms was tested. Based on the method of biographical interviews autobiographies of 34 women from 31 to 72 years and 36 men from 23 to 69 years were recorded and compared. Autobiographical texts were subjected to the procedure of expert categorical analysis; obtained semantic matrixes were processed by means of methods of mathematical statistics. It has been shown that factor analysis of the autobiographical texts in contrast to the frequency one, questioned the “gender normativity” of personal history. Tendency to use adaptive life strategies in designing men’s autobiographical scripts and transformation of gender strategies in formulating female scenarios is described. The results of empirical study of male and female autobiographies concretize theoretical propositions concerning social creativity of female gender group, constituting women’s autobiography in the line traditional “cultural scripts’” changing.
Keywords
Autobiography, gender, male/female culture, life script, factor analysis, open coding
Date of publication
03.01.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
576
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Almaev N.A., Kubrak T.A. Svyaz' lichnostnykh chert i nekotorykh formal'nykh kharakteristik rasskazov, poluchennykh po instruktsiyam Gottshalka i Adlera // Problemy psikhologii diskursa / Pod red. N.D. Pavlovoj, I.A. Zachesovoj. M.: Izd-vo "Institut psikhologii RAN", 2005. S. 62-72.         
    2. 

  2. Astaf'eva E.N., Kosheleva O.E., Mescherkina E.Yu., Nurkova V.V. Biograficheskoe interv'yu / Pod red. V.G. Bezrogova. M.: Izdatel'stvo URAO, 2001.
    3. 

  3. Bern Sh. Gendernaya psikhologiya. SPb.: Prajm- EVROZNAK; M.: OLMA-PRESS, 2004.
    4. 

  4. Borkhes Kh.L. Kollektsiya. SPb.: Severo-Zapad, 1992.
    5. 

  5. Braun B., Pedersen Eh., Runberg M. Skazki dlya dushi: ispol'zovanie skazok v psikhoterapii. M.: Informatsionnyj tsentr psikhologicheskoj kul'tury, 2000.
    6. 

  6. Bruner Dzh. Zhizn' kak narrativ // Postneklassicheskaya psikhologiya: Sotsial'nyj konstruktsionizm i narrativnyj podkhod. 2005. №1 (2). S. 9-30.
    7. 

  7. Gilmor D. Stanovlenie muzhestvennosti: kul'turnye kontsepty maskulinnosti. M.: ROSSPEhN, 2005.
    8. 

  8. Goroshko E.I. Yazykovoe soznanie: gendernaya paradigma. Monografiya. M., Khar'kov: INZhEK, 2003.
    9. 

  9. Dikman Kh. Yungianskij analiz volshebnykh skazok. M.: Akademicheskij proekt, 2000.
    10. 

  10. Dorodnev A.B. Psikhologicheskie determinanty verbalizatsii negativnogo opyta. Avtoreferat dis.. kand. psikhol.n. M., 2009.         
    11. 

  11. Zaretskij Yu.P. Istoriya sub'ektivnosti i istoriya avtobiografii: Vazhnye obnovleniya // Neprikosnovennyj zapas. 2012. № 3. S. 218-232.
    12. 

  12. Iberla K. Faktornyj analiz. Per. s nem. V.M. Ivanovoj. M.: Statistika, 1980.
    13. 

  13. Ispolatova E.N., Nikolaeva T.P. Modifitsirovannaya tekhnika analiza rannikh vospominanij lichnosti // Voprosy psikhologii. 1999. № 1. S. 69-76.
    14. 

  14. Kalmykova E.S., Mergentaler Eh. Narrativ v psikhoterapii: Rasskazy patsientov o lichnoj istorii // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 1998.№ 6. S. 97-104.          
    15. 

  15. Kon I.S. Istoriya i teoriya muzhskikh issledovanij // Gendernyj kalejdoskop / Pod red. M.M. Malyshevoj. M.: Academia, 2002.
    16. 

  16. Kon I.S. Maskulinnost' kak istoriya // Gendernye problemy v obschestvennykh naukakh. M.: Izd-vo IEhA RAN, 2001. S. 9-37.
    17. 

  17. Kon I.S. Rebenok i obschestvo: istoriko-ehtnograficheskaya perspektiva. M.: Nauka, 1988.
    18. 

  18. Kronik A., Akhmerov R. Kauzometriya: Metody samopoznaniya, psikhodiagnostiki i psikhoterapii v psikhologii zhiznennogo puti. M.: Smysl, 2008.
    19. 

  19. Kubrak T.A. Samoprezentatsiya sub'ekta. Sostoyanie problemy i diskursivnyj podkhod k izucheniyu // Problemy psikhologii diskursa / Pod red. N.D. Pavlovoj, I.A. Zachesovoj. M.: Izd-vo "Institut psikhologii RAN", 2005. S. 180-194.             
    20. 

  20. Leont'ev D.A. Perspektivy neklassicheskoj psikhodiagnostiki // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2010. №4 (12). URL: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/ num/2010n4-12/353-leontiev12.html (data obrascheniya: 27.01.2014 g.).                  
    21. 

  21. Makki R. Istoriya na million dollarov: master- klass dlya stsenaristov, pisatelej i ne tol'ko / Per. s angl. M.: Al'pina non-fikshn, 2008.
    22. 

  22. Malkova G.Yu. Vyyavlenie psikhologicheskikh osobennostej lichnosti metodom kontent-analiza // Problemy psikhologii diskursa / Pod red. N.D. Pavlovoj, I.A. Zachesovoj. M.: Izd-vo "Institut psikhologii RAN", 2005. S. 85-99.
    23. 

  23. Mid M. Muzhskoe i zhenskoe: issledovanie polovogo voprosa v menyayuschemsya mire. M., ROSSPEhN, 2004.
    24. 

  24. Nurkova V. Svershennoe prodolzhaetsya: psikhologiya avtobiograficheskoj pamyati lichnosti. M.: Izd-vo URAO, 2000.
    25. 

  25. Porus V.N. Tozhdestvo "Ya" - konflikt interpretatsij // Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya. 2011. № 3. S. 27-35.
    26. 

  26. Radina N.K. Metodologicheskie resursy sub'ektno-deyatel'nostnogo podkhoda dlya gendernykh issledovanij v psikhologii // Sub'ektnyj podkhod v psikhologii / Otv. red. A.L. Zhuravlev, V.V. Znakov, Z.I. Ryabikina, E.A. Sergienko. M.: Izd-vo "Institut psikhologii RAN", 2009. S. 205-314.
    27. 

  27. Radina N.K., Nikitina A.A. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya muzhestvennosti. Sotsial'no-konstruktivistskij podkhod. M.: Borges, 2011.
    28. 

  28. Radina N.K., Pavlycheva T.N. Rasskazy o zhizni kak otrazhenie psikhologicheskikh problem vypusknikov sirotskikh uchrezhdenij // Voprosy psikhologii. 2010. № 5. S. 41-50.              
    29. 

  29. Sidorenko E. Terapiya i trening po Al'fredu Adleru. SPb.: Rech', 2000.
    30. 

  30. Strauss A., Korbin D. Osnovy kachestvennogo issledovaniya: obosnovannaya teoriya, protsedury i tekhniki / Per. T.S. Vasil'evoj. M.: URSS, 2008.
    31. 

  31. Fridman Dzh., Kombs Dzh. Konstruirovanie inykh real'nostej. M.: Klass, 2001.
    32. 

  32. Levant R., Richmond K. A review of research on masculinity ideologies using the Male Role Norms Inventory // Journal of Men's Studies. 2007. Vol. 15. № 2. P. 130-146.
    33. 

  33. Titscher S. Objective Hermeneutics in Tischer // Methods of text and discourse analysis. Reprint. London [u.a.]: Sage Publ., 2003. P. 198-212.
    34. 

  34. White M.D., Marsh E.E. Content Analysis: a Flexible Methodology // Library trends. 2006. № 1 (55). P. 35-36.
    35. 

  35. Tannen D. You just don’t understand. Women and men in conversation. N.Y.: William Morrow and Company Inc., 1990.
    36.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate